MrDinsdale Posted February 7 Posted February 7 6 minutes ago, Al Krow said: So in answer to your question with regard to filters... I've now been using the GT Core for a week and getting my head around it's various features and possibilities. The EBS IQ filter pedal I've currently got on my board (pictured above) is one of the very best analogue filters I've come across - almost on a par with 3Leaf filters I've had the privelege of owning, and considerably less expensive. I've set up a filter patch on the Core, [using the Touch Wah fx in band-pass filter mode - in case of wider interest] which gives me the choice of up or down filter. I've also included an octaver, but just with up-filter, to thicken up the sound. Really like what I'm hearing on both up-sweep and down-sweep. And the excellent EBS... well that's just been taken off my board and will likely be appearing in the for-sale section in due course 😊 That's ace, really tried but struggled to get anything dialled that i liked. I didn't have a filter pedal to compare with though which didn't help! Quote
Al Krow Posted February 27 Author Posted February 27 @MrDinsdale Newbie Q: if I put a pedal in the send / return loop of the Core am I correct that it can be set to run in parallel and won't be impacted by any of the fx in the Core? I'm thinking that would be the ideal set up for little drum pedal for home use. Quote
MrDinsdale Posted February 27 Posted February 27 1 hour ago, Al Krow said: @MrDinsdale Newbie Q: if I put a pedal in the send / return loop of the Core am I correct that it can be set to run in parallel and won't be impacted by any of the fx in the Core? I'm thinking that would be the ideal set up for little drum pedal for home use. Can't remember what options there are in the FX Loop block, ultimately you'd just be using the return of it anyways. If there's an option to blend the FX Loop with the original signal, you could stick it at the end of your chain after all your fx, amp and cab stuff with the direct signal blended in. Otherwise you could do the same with a parallel divider at the end of the chain with the FX loop on one side. Definitely doable though. 1 Quote
clauster Posted March 4 Posted March 4 More of a question than a tip or idea. Am I right in thinking IRs are only active on outputs set to recording? I want to use just a couple of the effects before my amp in one of my bands. If I turn the amp module off and don't have recording set on the output, then I just get the effects, right? Quote
matybigfro Posted March 4 Posted March 4 Close but not quiet spot on. Speaker simulation (how boss refers to it's own ir's) or IR's are tied to A.I.R.D. amp blocks (how boss refers to amp simulation) so when both amp blocks are switched off there is no speaker simulation. Output selection is irrelevant in this configuration regardless of how it's set speaker simulation is also disabled. Alternatively if you have output set to recording in the speaker simulation block you can then also select the speaker type as off and then you will have no amp simulation regardless of whether the amp block is on or not. 1 Quote
Al Krow Posted April 2 Author Posted April 2 Just picking up on your excellent post on the "distortion that keeps the 'thump'" post: On 29/03/2025 at 15:19, BEADist said: For me 'blending' only works if the clean path has a LPF and the filthy path has a HPF in front. In stompbox-domain that's a lot of pedals for a distortion sound (... so yeah, Boss GT Core : ) By the way, to me the X-Bass distortion on there is quite good. I played in a loud sludge band and from the distortions I tried (several blended options and also Darkglass pedals) this X-Bass was absolutely the easiest to fit into a mix and without loosing 'thumb' (if by that you mean the low frequency portion of the attack, the part that differentiates loud bass and loud guitar). On it's own it sounds a bit boring, not spectacular at all. Because of this it took me a long time to actually try this one. Good luck with your endless search, do not give up, do not leave the distortion to the guit@ri$ts !!! 😃 (certainly in recordings there will be distortion on the bass to get a huge sound ?!) I'll need to give your recommended X-bass distortion a try out! I've been using the AIRD Preamp Orange stack which gives a very juicy fuzz that I'm liking a lot. As we were discussing, so much more weight to it with a clean blend parallel path, and with the EQ in the +125Hz bass/low mids given a boost on both paths, combined with using a comp as a sustain on the fuzz path but something much more standard on the clean blend path. 1 Quote
MichaelDean Posted April 2 Posted April 2 1 hour ago, Al Krow said: Just picking up on your excellent post on the "distortion that keeps the 'thump'" post: I'll need to give your recommended X-bass distortion a try out! I've been using the AIRD Preamp Orange stack which gives a very juicy fuzz that I'm liking a lot. As we were discussing, so much more weight to it with a clean blend parallel path, and with the EQ in the +125Hz bass/low mids given a boost on both paths, combined with using a comp as a sustain on the fuzz path but something much more standard on the clean blend path. I've been using the Fat Tube bass preamp with no cab sim as an overdrive/fuzz with great success on my GX-100. I've also got some general EQ going on. Boosted around 1k for a bit of grind and cut some mids around 350Hz. Also worth a try... 2 Quote
BEADist Posted April 3 Posted April 3 Thank you AlKrow and MichaelDean, I always forget to use the amps as distortion units! I should experiment with those again. Thanks for the reminder! 😍 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.