Jackroadkill Posted November 23, 2023 Posted November 23, 2023 43 minutes ago, Reggaebass said: Flats or rounds… Easy; rounds. Quote
Reggaebass Posted November 23, 2023 Posted November 23, 2023 2 minutes ago, Jackroadkill said: Easy; rounds. Easy; Flats 😁 1 1 Quote
Frank Blank Posted November 23, 2023 Posted November 23, 2023 Thus in contemporary quantum theory it seems that the world must be divided into a wavy "quantum system," and a remainder which is in some sense "classical." The division is made one way or another, in a particular application, according to the degree of accuracy and completeness aimed at. For me it is the indispensability, and above all the shiftiness, of such a division that is the big surprise of quantum mechanics. It introduces an essential ambiguity into fundamental physical theory, if only at a level of accuracy and completeness beyond any required in practice. It is the toleration of such an ambiguity, not merely provisionally but permanently, and at the most fundamental level, that is the real break with the classical ideal. It is this rather than the failure of any particular concept such as "particle" or "determinism." In the remainder of this essay I will outline a number of world views with physicists have entertained in trying to digest this situation. Drives me effin' mental that one. 1 2 Quote
tauzero Posted November 23, 2023 Posted November 23, 2023 4 hours ago, SumOne said: True, it is said a lot, but that's basically because that is the main reason to have/not have a 5, so I think is perfectly reasonable reason to sell a 5 (a bit unnecessary to mention when selling though I suppose). It's the main reason that people who have bought a 5-string and not found the main reason for having a 5-string have for selling it. 1 Quote
tauzero Posted November 23, 2023 Posted November 23, 2023 57 minutes ago, nilorius said: Cheers ! Unicorns! Quote
rwillett Posted November 23, 2023 Posted November 23, 2023 2 hours ago, Frank Blank said: Thus in contemporary quantum theory it seems that the world must be divided into a wavy "quantum system," and a remainder which is in some sense "classical." The division is made one way or another, in a particular application, according to the degree of accuracy and completeness aimed at. For me it is the indispensability, and above all the shiftiness, of such a division that is the big surprise of quantum mechanics. It introduces an essential ambiguity into fundamental physical theory, if only at a level of accuracy and completeness beyond any required in practice. It is the toleration of such an ambiguity, not merely provisionally but permanently, and at the most fundamental level, that is the real break with the classical ideal. It is this rather than the failure of any particular concept such as "particle" or "determinism." In the remainder of this essay I will outline a number of world views with physicists have entertained in trying to digest this situation. Drives me effin' mental that one. I can see your point here, you have to think in both a classic, almost Newtonian way of thinking and then at the same time switch your brain almost through 180 degrees into Niels Bohr mode, depending on exactly how you wish to examine the world. I have the same issue every time I buy a guitar, I think classically, "Can I afford it?" and then I shift into the Quantum mode of uncertainty, "Will my other half find out about it?". We can also consider Shrodinger here, his classic "Is the cat in the box dead or alive" experiment, can be rewritten to "If my other half doesn't know about the new guitar, does it even exist for her?" or more simply "If she finds out, will she kill me?", basically I am alive and dead at the same time fulfilling Shrodingers axioms. 1 1 Quote
Frank Blank Posted November 23, 2023 Posted November 23, 2023 3 minutes ago, rwillett said: I can see your point here, you have to think in both a classic, almost at the same time fulfilling Shrodingers axioms. I almost saw Shrodinger's point whilst fulfilling his axioms but thankfully I was arrested before it became a classical paradox. 1 Quote
lozkerr Posted November 24, 2023 Posted November 24, 2023 2 hours ago, tauzero said: It's the main reason that people who have bought a 5-string and not found the main reason for having a 5-string have for selling it. Nailed it. There are two or three songs in my two bands' combined repertoire that actually need notes below bottom E, but I could never go back to a four-string now - I'd have to re-learn the fingering for well over a hundred songs. Quote
EssentialTension Posted November 25, 2023 Posted November 25, 2023 On 18/11/2023 at 14:32, chris_b said: I hate the IBTL mob. It's such a smug, stupid thing to post!!! Even smugger is the very rare IATL. 1 Quote
upside downer Posted November 25, 2023 Posted November 25, 2023 28 minutes ago, EssentialTension said: Even smugger is the very rare IATL. Institute for Advanced Teaching and Learning? International Asbestos Testing Laboratories? Eh? 1 Quote
EssentialTension Posted November 25, 2023 Posted November 25, 2023 21 minutes ago, upside downer said: Institute for Advanced Teaching and Learning? International Asbestos Testing Laboratories? Eh? In at the lock! 1 Quote
ahpook Posted November 26, 2023 Posted November 26, 2023 On 23/11/2023 at 19:54, Frank Blank said: Thus in contemporary quantum theory it seems that the world must be divided into a wavy "quantum system," and a remainder which is in some sense "classical." The division is made one way or another, in a particular application, according to the degree of accuracy and completeness aimed at. For me it is the indispensability, and above all the shiftiness, of such a division that is the big surprise of quantum mechanics. It introduces an essential ambiguity into fundamental physical theory, if only at a level of accuracy and completeness beyond any required in practice. It is the toleration of such an ambiguity, not merely provisionally but permanently, and at the most fundamental level, that is the real break with the classical ideal. It is this rather than the failure of any particular concept such as "particle" or "determinism." In the remainder of this essay I will outline a number of world views with physicists have entertained in trying to digest this situation. Drives me effin' mental that one. I love it....it's like opening the Haynes Manual for the Universe and finding it was written by Lewis Carrol Quote
Guest Posted November 26, 2023 Posted November 26, 2023 11 hours ago, EssentialTension said: Even smugger is the very rare IATL. 10 hours ago, upside downer said: Institute for Advanced Teaching and Learning? International Asbestos Testing Laboratories? Eh? I also thought about that. It could also mean: I Am The Law Quote
tauzero Posted November 27, 2023 Posted November 27, 2023 On 26/11/2023 at 09:32, eloisa said: I also thought about that. It could also mean: I Am The Law I Also Teach Lawyers? Quote
Daz39 Posted November 27, 2023 Posted November 27, 2023 Had to laugh - that ridonculously expensive Alembic on Reverb has one comment about it playing like butter... I now know why supermarket Lurpak needed to be kept in plastic boxes with security tags on earlier in the year! Quote
ezbass Posted November 27, 2023 Posted November 27, 2023 Vote for your favourite 3* *shameless plug for the photographic competition. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.