Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Prejudices When Choosing A Bass


Chienmortbb

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Andyjr1515 said:

This.  A bridge specifically and carefully designed so as not to work.

 

I know you're joking, but I can assure you that it works just fine, in that it hold the strings in place, intonated.

 

The three point hate is getting a bit old - there are worse bridges out there by some distance.  I don't mind it, it works, it doesn't eat babies.  Set and forget, job's a good 'un.  I can see how its foibles would irritate a tinkerer or frequent string changer.  I just leave it alone to do its job, seems to be the best approach.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, neepheid said:

 

I know you're joking, but I can assure you that it works just fine, in that it hold the strings in place, intonated.

 

The three point hate is getting a bit old - there are worse bridges out there by some distance.  I don't mind it, it works, it doesn't eat babies.  Set and forget, job's a good 'un.  I can see how its foibles would irritate a tinkerer or frequent string changer.  I just leave it alone to do its job, seems to be the best approach.

Yes, there are worse bridges. Even Rickenbacker replaced theirs eventually.

 

When I got my Epiphone Thunderbird I couldn't get it to intonate properly at the action I wanted. I grant, that is exceptionally low, but it was infuriating that either the D or G string could never be got to intonate properly. So, after a few hours of creative swearing I ordered a Hipshot. Unsurprisingly, that worked exceptionally well.

 

The simple fact is the 3 point bridge is crap if you want a super low action. Gibson don't care about bass players so we get the scraps from the table and a bridge made in a cave by bending some corrugated iron bin lids into a weird dolphin shape and saying "that'll do."

 

However, on a more serious note, maybe it should be "bridges that are amazingly difficult to adjust." 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was always able to set them exactly where things needed to go without any drama or cursing. And yet I’ve replaced three of them with Hipshots. I just thought they looked better.

They are much better for palm muting , and they certainly have much greater adjustability.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The lack of length behind the saddles is my (main) gripe with the three point bridge.  How hard (and not expensive) would it be to change the casting so that the E string does not rest on the silk or where the winding is not yet correctly established.  P*&# poor engineering.  Saying that, the rest of my SG bass now fitted with a Hipshot bridge and machines  is really good, especially the fretwork.

Edited by 3below
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 05/12/2023 at 10:58, Chienmortbb said:

It bugs me that:

  • any bass is not offered in Black.
  • a headstock on a 4 string has a 3 + 1 machinehead pattern.
  • someone says they can only use one brand or type of bass,

 

What are your prejudices?

Excellent thread 👏🏻

 

- 5 strings, B-G

- 18mm or less at the bridge

- two soapbar shape humbuckers

- need to see the grain in the body wood

- three band active 18v preamp

- side mounted jack

- 10lbs or less

Edited by moley6knipe
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like a Cort A4 Plus, but I don't like the look of the bridge. It looks a faff to set the intonation on it.

 

I'm not keen on gold hardware, or black for that matter.

 

Natural finishes, no thank you. Although I do have a natural finish bass, sort of, that I love. It's got a heavy lacquer finish, which I should hate really, but don't.

 

Pointy basses, not really my thing.

 

Light colour finish. I tend to gravitate to darker colours. 

 

There's probably more.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of my prejudices are based on aesthetic features:

Single cut basses

Coffee table finishes, often goes with the above.

Relic’d basses

Headless basses.

The look of Alembics, apart from John Entwistle explorer one, although I’m sure they’re superb basses, if a bit extortionate.

Ditto Wal and Warwick shapes. 

 

I play four and five string basses but have never felt the need for a six. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like:

 

Burst finishes

3-point bridges

Active basses (except for Stingrays)

Pointy basses (BC Rich in particular)

Most of these horrible hand made things that are made out of cr@p like woodworm-riddled slabs. Pretentious nonsense.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 06/12/2023 at 10:36, Lord Summerisle said:

Exactly. A tuner is either a device showing the correct pitch for each note, or it’s an ocean fish.

When you think about it though,'machine head' is a weird substitute for tuner.You'd think maybe that the Machine Head was the large flat part at the top of the neck,where the 'Tuning machines' are situated.😃

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, squire5 said:

When you think about it though,'machine head' is a weird substitute for tuner.You'd think maybe that the Machine Head was the large flat part at the top of the neck,where the 'Tuning machines' are situated.😃

This makes sense too. Personally I don’t really care if anyone calls two different things “tuners”. I also never lost any sleep as a child worrying about the dual meaning of “compass” and I don’t recall anyone going on a Cub Scout hike getting lost because they brought an item which draws circles rather than points north.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A new bass needs to be pristine, untouched by man (or woman), not even by the guy who built it.

 

My dream is to one day buy a Fender Custom Shop instrument and never even open the outer packaging. Just be happy in the knowledge that I have it and happily can go about knocking more dings into my frankenbass.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It has to be a bolt on. I still look at neck-through basses and sometimes get tempted. Then I remember that I seldom get the response and attack

to my liking. I once bought a Tobias signature six-string and regretted it right away in the first band practice. 😅

 

So, preferably 4 strings and passive.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 19/12/2023 at 12:13, Lord Summerisle said:

This makes sense too. Personally I don’t really care if anyone calls two different things “tuners”. I also never lost any sleep as a child worrying about the dual meaning of “compass” and I don’t recall anyone going on a Cub Scout hike getting lost because they brought an item which draws circles rather than points north.

When I started playing, there were Tuning Pegs on many stringed instruments, but on electric guitars there were machine heads. There were no "Tuners" we used pitch pipes and our ears. You can tell this  on some recordings from the 60s and even 70s. Now we have electronic Tuners, people insist on calling machine heads tuners. You can call a dog a cat, but do not expect it to catch mice.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

pointy headstocks

sharp angles in bodys.

headless basses

stick basses

roundwound or tapewound strings

cheap electrics that have next to no variance in tone

glued in headstocks

light bass bodys

maple fretless necks

stock musicman stingray pickups, they still not addressed that out of line G pole piece

that plastic chad valley ronco  stingray battery holder.

the newer wide G&L natural maple necks ( awfull)

bridges that when the barrels are on the base the strings are still too high. ( more to do with the neck pocket too high really)

sh!t tuners that unwind themselfs

carved engraved bodys

single cut away bodys

fat chunky necks

basses that are more "ART" than usable bass, like overpriced over the top Alembics.

semi body basses with F holes, though some do look great.

fanned fret boards.

see through resin bodys

covers over pickups, right where i want play

pickups that are right on the end of the neck, i can get my fingers under to snap,

and last but not least... Anything that says rickenbacker

 

im pritty sure that covers most of it 🙂

 

 

 

 

Edited by funkgod
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, funkgod said:

pointy headstocks

sharp angles in bodys.

headless basses

stick basses

roundwound or tapewound strings

cheap electrics that have next to no variance in tone

glued in headstocks

light bass bodys

maple fretless necks

stock musicman stingray pickups, they still not addressed that out of line G pole piece

that plastic chad valley ronco  stingray battery holder.

the newer wide G&L natural maple necks ( awfull)

bridges that when the barrels are on the base the strings are still too high. ( more to do with the neck pocket too high really)

sh!t tuners that unwind themselfs

carved engraved bodys

single cut away bodys

fat chunky necks

basses that are more "ART" than usable bass, like overpriced over the top Alembics.

semi body basses with F holes, though some do look great.

fanned fret boards.

see through resin bodys

covers over pickups, right where i want play

pickups that are right on the end of the neck, i can get my fingers under to snap,

and last but not least... Anything that says rickenbacker

 

 

 

 

I reckon you and @Jackroadkill should team up, pick an unsuspecting music shop and annihilate all their bass stock in one blitzkrieg visit. 😎

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, snorkie635 said:

I reckon you and @Jackroadkill should team up, pick an unsuspecting music shop and annihilate all their bass stock in one blitzkrieg visit. 😎

 

yeee haarrr , Let me at them :-), i could walk down the line of them cr@p, cr@p cr@p cr@p cr@p cr@p cr@p cr@p cr@p ..meehhhh av ya got any plecs ? ?.. ahhh.... yeaaa there cr@p too, ah well..bye 😋

 

Edited by funkgod
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 20/12/2023 at 15:07, Chienmortbb said:

When I started playing, there were Tuning Pegs on many stringed instruments, but on electric guitars there were machine heads. There were no "Tuners" we used pitch pipes and our ears. You can tell this  on some recordings from the 60s and even 70s. Now we have electronic Tuners, people insist on calling machine heads tuners. You can call a dog a cat, but do not expect it to catch mice.

 

There's this new Act of Parliament coming in...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...