Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

What Sire did next


neepheid

Recommended Posts

These don't do anything for me but I don't get the reactions, that sparkle one looks fine to me and the other pics just look like flat renders which don't show contouring and rounded edges. Ripping MM off a lot, Lakland off a bit but still looking different enough.

 

Will most likely be a much better option than the financially comparable offering from Musicman.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, neepheid said:

They've updated the page, now there's a sparkly ray-a-like...

 

SireZ3sparkly.thumb.jpg.87c6507630b3e913e3dc24088b06edca.jpg

The tuners look a bit big on that headstock to me but, other than that, it works from my perspective and would be an easy fix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 20/12/2023 at 16:04, Raj_Shredder said:

I thought that Ernie Ball had a patent on the 3+1 MM Headstock? Are there any other mass produced basses out there, other than EBMM, using the 3+1? 

 

I wouldn't have thought that that would be patentable. The headstock might be a trademark, like various aspects of R*ckenbackers, but that would encompass the entire headstock shape rather than the 3+1ness of it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mind the F series, but the string spacing on all the 6s is too wide for my tastes.

 

The Zs are likely fine basses, and I'd be amazed if they weren't in the same class as the EBMMs, just a whole lot less expensive. However, pickguards and control plates make me nauseous, so a definite no thanks.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 18/12/2023 at 17:48, Sibob said:

Those lower horns are a swing and a miss aren’t they. Also goes to show that not everyone can design a decent looking single-cut.

G-series could be interesting though, Godin vibes probably.

 

Si

Yeah doesn't look great, but it might be down the not being able to legally do much better due to copyright etc. Not a fact, but might be the case?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jah Wibble said:

Yeah doesn't look great, but it might be down the not being able to legally do much better due to copyright etc. Not a fact, but might be the case?

 


Probably, plus a wish to try and create some kind of design branding…..but hasn’t gone well IMO 😅

 

Si

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve been saying for ages I wanted to see Sire get involved with MM style basses,that U7 looks awesome too, the U5 is a well underrated and although I am a BIG Sire fan, I don’t rate the Heritage preamp particularly and mostly played my P7’s/V7’s in passive. 
 

I rate Sire over Fender if you’re either doing like for like (MIM v The better Sires like V7/9 etc) or if you’re doing value Sire wins hands down IMO. I’ve stopped buying cheaper instruments and then losing money cos I always end up upgrading to the better one than I wanted anyway, but Sire are the budget brand I really rate.

 

That being said I can’t see the point at all in the V10 - same preamp/pickups as the V7 and same preamp as the £199 V3! Same complaint with the F10 - I really think it’s bizarre to have the same preamp on the “boutique” range that u do on your cheapest Jazz. Apart from having Passive tone in active mode (my pet hate when people don’t do this!) and i guess parametric mids which are ok, I think the preamp sounds crap. The bass is at 20hz and is only useful to cut low end which then means you have to set your mids as low as poss (~80hz I think) to get any low end boost, meaning it only really functions as a 2 band for me, the treble is way high as well, but it’s easily replaced and for a lot of people the Sires are just great mod platforms anyway.
 

I’ll probably buy one of the acoustics and never use it, I look forward to it sitting in the studio unplayed until I inevitably sell it on for 1/2 what I paid!  

Edited by Paddy777
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, tauzero said:

 

John Hall® is very precious about his trademarks though.

I'm sure he's not trawling internet forums looking for mention of his brand to sue randoms for trademark infringement though, especially as just mentioning the brand isn't trademark infringement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, lemmywinks said:

 

Tanglewood and Vintage have been doing 3+1 (and 4+1 on the 5) for donkeys' years. Westfield, J&D and SX also did 3+1.

Not sure vintage/sx/tanglewood would harm the SUB/Sterling sales as much as Sire…

 

and vintage/tanglewood are much more a UK concern.

 

Mind you, looking more like Nemo than a Stingray may keep these on the shelf rather than harming anyone else’s sales.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, AndyTravis said:

Not sure vintage/sx/tanglewood would harm the SUB/Sterling sales as much as Sire…

 

and vintage/tanglewood are much more a UK concern.

 

Mind you, looking more like Nemo than a Stingray may keep these on the shelf rather than harming anyone else’s sales.

 

I think the companies still have to be seen as protecting their trademarks and not abandoning them regardless of how they're affecting sales, I think they're registered over here as well. At the time Tanglewood etc would have been competing with OLP basses.

 

Tbh the real shots of the Sire Z which show contouring look fine to me, certainly less like a toilet seat that a real MM 4 string.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a theory that these have been put on the websites as bait or testers as it were.

 

The company have had a few ideas about what would work next so they post pictures of different potential models. They then sit back and wait for the ensuing debate amongst us here and over on Talkbs. They gather the information and then decide on the design, layout etc of the final product.

 

No focus groups or test groups to pay for, they merely let us decide what we want.

 

Then again this could backfire as very few of us know what we want 😂

 

 

 

 

homer-simpsons.gif

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, asingardenof said:

I'm sure he's not trawling internet forums looking for mention of his brand to sue randoms for trademark infringement though, especially as just mentioning the brand isn't trademark infringement.

Ah, I see you're unaware of how he runs the company. Allegedly. 

 

The contents of this post are the opinions of Jack and should not be taken as representative of the opinions of Basschat or All The Good Names Are Taken Ltd. 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...