How would You do ?

[nilorius]

20 minutes ago, Rob Bisby said:

I'd probably ditch the compressor if there's an envelope filter being used, compressors give you less dynamics unless it's got a clean blend on it, and envelope filters respond with dynamics so you won't hear that cut as much if there's a compressor in the chain. My opinion BTW

That is how ended the ''game'' - always turning compresson off when using filter.

[Rob Bisby]

20 hours ago, nilorius said:

That is how ended the ''game'' - always turning compresson off when using filter.

Most ideal thing to do mate kinda kills the point of being filters

[Rob Bisby]

Another idea would be to get a switcher to switch between compression and filter if there's parts of a song that require it

[LukeFRC]

why wouldn't you compress after filter? Filter reacts to the input as normal, the signal kept under control a bit by the compressor? 

[nilorius]

1 hour ago, Rob Bisby said:

Most ideal thing to do mate kinda kills the point of being filters

You know mate 😉 filters and compressors sometimes affects alot from bass guitarists brain sizes !

[Quatschmacher]

On 27/03/2024 at 14:55, lidl e said:

I would never think to put compressor after envelope.

 

Why would you want to tame those peaks and valleys?

 

Give the envelope a nice even tone from the comp, no?

You still get the frequency sweeps but without big volume spikes at high resonance. It can be very useful for taming some of the wilder filters out there such as the Fwonkbeta, Enigma and MF-101.

[mcnach]

On 11/04/2024 at 12:25, LukeFRC said:

why wouldn't you compress after filter? Filter reacts to the input as normal, the signal kept under control a bit by the compressor? 

 

That's what i used to do with a FX25. Those filters have wild swings, they're very responsive when you set the sensitivity control just right. The compressor afterwards made the whole thing a little less... wild, in a good way.