Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Benefits of usung fx send/return?


Recommended Posts

I have an Ashdown ABM600 evo iv which is easily the best amp I have owned. I also use a pedalboard with a bunch of boss compact pedals.

 

bassboard.thumb.jpeg.1c51ba8cd801d397819851345564b91a.jpeg

 

Until now I have always used two cables: one from the bass to the pedalboard, and one from the pedalboard to the amp input. When setting up last night it occurred to me that maybe I should be using the fx send/return instead. I'll pack an extra cable for the next rehearsal to try this, but I was wondering what difference this might make to the sound and how many people use the send/return on their amps, or have tried it and gone back to running the pedals into the amp's input?

 

 

Edited by Jean-Luc Pickguard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Floor pedals are configured to operate with the low voltage output of pickups. The voltage at the effects loop is much higher, at what's called line level, which is what rack mount processors operate at. Using floor pedals at line level can cause distortion.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way to do it is as already mentioned ie time based fx like chorus delay or reverb sound better in the fx loop 

Drive and compressor in front of amp 

 

Amp FX loop is designed for that reason ie FX in the loop after the amp input and any drive and compression 

 

Musicians have been gigging like this for years especially guitarists who prefer an amps drive sound 

 

Try it both ways and decide but with a clean bass amp I don’t think you will hear much difference 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, BassAdder60 said:

time based fx like chorus delay or reverb sound better in the fx loop 

Drive and compressor in front of amp

That's a matter of taste and specific application/context, it isn't a universal law.

 

Edited by Baloney Balderdash
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Baloney Balderdash said:

That's a matter of taste and specific application/context, it isn't a universal law.

 

No it’s not a “ law” it’s just a more recognisable way of a starting point instead of everything in the front end !

Placement of fx pedals is a personal choice but there are well known reasons that delay or time based fx sound better after drive but you can place them however you see fit ! 😉

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, BassAdder60 said:

No it’s not a “ law” it’s just a more recognisable way of a starting point instead of everything in the front end !

Placement of fx pedals is a personal choice but there are well known reasons that delay or time based fx sound better after drive but you can place them however you see fit ! 😉

And yet you go right on and claim they sound universally better that way. 

 

Again...

 

It's like you only read the last 4 words of my post.

 

As I already said it entirely depends on personal taste and specific application/context.

 

Drive after reverb and delay after reverb can sound freaking damn astonishing, it depends on the application and context though.

 

And personally I prefer chorus and other modulation before drive.

 

Edited by Baloney Balderdash
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Baloney Balderdash said:

And yet you go right on and claim they sound universally better that way. 

 

Again...

 

It's like you only read the last 4 words of my post.

 

As I already said it entirely depends on personal taste and specific application/context.

 

I think we will just leave it at agree to disagree 😳😉😂

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BassAdder60 said:

I think we will just leave it at agree to disagree 😳😉😂

Drive after reverb and delay after reverb can sound freaking damn astonishing, it depends on the application and context though.

 

And personally I prefer chorus and other modulation before drive.

 

But you disagree with my taste, while your taste is the universal truth? :scratch_one-s_head:

 

What the f***... :shok:

 

Edited by Baloney Balderdash
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Baloney Balderdash said:

Drive after reverb and delay after reverb can sound freaking damn astonishing, it depends on the application and context though.

 

And personally I prefer chorus and other modulation before drive.

 

But you disagree with my taste, while your taste is the universal truth? :scratch_one-s_head:

Well it’s my experience and if it differs from yours excellent!!

Choose however you wish to read into that what you may!!’ 🙄😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 28/07/2024 at 14:30, fretmeister said:

Drive and filters and compressor, octaves etcin front of the amp. Time based in the loop, delays, chorus etc.

That’s the usual way.

 

 

+1 to this .. 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to go to the trouble of putting just the chorus through the send/return as I only use it to add some depth to the sound when the SY-1 is used to emulate an organ doubling the bass. I hadn't considered the difference in levels before asking the question, so I will take on board (no pun intended) what Bill said, and as I am not using rack fx requiring a line level input, I will continue to put the pedals between the bass and the amp input.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...