Stub Mandrel Posted September 18 Share Posted September 18 13 minutes ago, ped said: That's a minefield, because we don't have the capacity to do due diligence that should be the buyer's responsibility. If we allowed an ad that turned out to be a scam, would that be our fault? Facebook seems to suffer no consequences. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LukeFRC Posted September 18 Share Posted September 18 Just now, Stub Mandrel said: Facebook seems to suffer no consequences. I suspect, but might be wrong, that the Basschat legal department is slightly smaller than that of Facebook 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ped Posted September 18 Author Share Posted September 18 Even just morally, I think by approving an advert we would be putting ourselves in a tricky position. far better to put the onus on the seller to prove they are genuine and for the buyer to check. Thankfully BC is a nice group where these cases are few and far between, and easily spotted by the members. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neepheid Posted September 18 Share Posted September 18 Just do your due diligence - this place is not immune from bad actors, cosy and friendly though it is. Check for a feedback thread, check the person's posting history. If something feels off, walk away - it's only a bass/amp/whatever. Report concerns. BC as an entity should not be held responsible for what a few bad apples do (or try to do). You need to take personal responsibility for your own online safety. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackroadkill Posted September 18 Share Posted September 18 I think the easiest way to look at it is like this: Ped's house, Ped's rules. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ped Posted September 18 Author Share Posted September 18 1 minute ago, Jackroadkill said: I think the easiest way to look at it is like this: Ped's house, Ped's rules. Sybil makes the rules in my house 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LukeFRC Posted September 18 Share Posted September 18 (edited) so when folk* are like "oh basschats not what it was, it's going to the dogs" ... they're not wrong? Edited September 18 by LukeFRC *for clarity, these people were invented for comedic effect 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ped Posted September 18 Author Share Posted September 18 1 hour ago, LukeFRC said: so when folk* are like "oh basschats not what it was, it's going to the dogs" ... they're not wrong? Yeah, she's forcing me to investigate Impulse Response loaders at the moment. She even makes payments on my account and the gear arrives without me knowing, honest! 🤫 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ead Posted September 18 Share Posted September 18 I was given this for a birthday (reasonably not too recently). Can I have permission to use this instead of Lego please? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Downunderwonder Posted September 18 Share Posted September 18 11 hours ago, ped said: That's a minefield, because we don't have the capacity to do due diligence that should be the buyer's responsibility. If we allowed an ad that turned out to be a scam, would that be our fault? It's pretty standard that a first post on signing up to a forum is checked that it smells of real person interested in the forum. The main purpose is adding a gateway against spammers but scammers will get weeded out also. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ped Posted September 18 Author Share Posted September 18 Just now, Downunderwonder said: It's pretty standard that a first post on signing up to a forum is checked that it smells of real person interested in the forum. The main purpose is adding a gateway against spammers but scammers will get weeded out also. Thanks for the advice 👍🏼 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burns-bass Posted September 18 Share Posted September 18 I’m not going to read through the 4 pages here, but I think the post its are a great idea and I salute anyone who suggested it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LukeFRC Posted September 18 Share Posted September 18 8 minutes ago, Burns-bass said: I’m not going to read through the 4 pages here, but I think the post its are a great idea and I salute anyone who suggested it. It was the dog. I think that was on page 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.7e18f76540598a8efc0e6ca9be453059.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.