Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

SBMM hates us


neepheid

Recommended Posts

On 21/08/2024 at 11:30, Cato said:

Pricing aside I'm slightly confused about the thinking behind this.

 

Is there that much demand for a passive Ray?

 

If you want the classic Ray sound on a budget surely you'd look at the active options like the Sub or the new Sires for not much more.

 

G&L did the Kiloton tribute a few years ago, which was a budget passive Ray type affair and while personally I thought it was a very good looking instrument, neither that or it's full fat US  made sibling seem to have set the world alight.

I had and sold a Kiloton Tribute.  It did a Rayish sound but even with the three different coil split etc options, I found it lacked a little versatility (and it was heavy).  I'm keen on the Sire Z7 as it has a pre amp and also a neck single coil and the bridge humbucker is in the Stingray position, not nearer the bridge, like most dual humbucker basses.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 21/08/2024 at 07:42, tegs07 said:

Importing from the USA can be prohibitively expensive. I’ve fallen into that trap before.

 

I doubt any SBMM instrument sees the USA territory, unless an USAnian buys one.

They originally claimed to be built overseas and sent to EBMM for QC and setup. That has not been the case in years.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
21 hours ago, mcnach said:

 

I doubt any SBMM instrument sees the USA territory, unless an USAnian buys one.

They originally claimed to be built overseas and sent to EBMM for QC and setup. That has not been the case in years.

 

Well, that just makes it worse.  It's simply price gouging then (unless they've got themselves entangled in the worst distribution deal in history - I'm really trying to give benefit of the doubt here, but I'm running out of ideas/options).  All other manufacturers seem to be able to get their wares here for a price comparable to the USA one, even if it is simply by changing the $ into a £.

Edited by neepheid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, mcnach said:

 

I doubt any SBMM instrument sees the USA territory, unless an USAnian buys one.

They originally claimed to be built overseas and sent to EBMM for QC and setup. That has not been the case in years.

IMG_9732.thumb.png.d9cc2a72e16804f42d022d24fb211327.png

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tegs07 said:

IMG_9732.thumb.png.d9cc2a72e16804f42d022d24fb211327.png

Well they are either lying and the whole thing is a big conspiracy, or they are telling the truth and import duties plus economies of scale make the instruments more expensive in the UK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tegs07 said:

Well they are either lying and the whole thing is a big conspiracy, or they are telling the truth and import duties plus economies of scale make the instruments more expensive in the UK.

If the quality was good enough in their country of manufacture then they could just ship them to the countries to be sold direct - you’re paying duty to get them to the USA then again to the UK. 

I bet we’d be flabbergasted to find out how much they cost out of the factory door, I’d wager £100-150 at most for a £500 bass if it has to go via the USA. 
You’re paying a lot of money to get that “checked by our awesome techs in the USA” promise.

Edited by Minininjarob
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Minininjarob said:

If the quality was good enough in their country of manufacture then they could just ship them to the countries to be sold direct - you’re paying duty to get them to the USA then again to the UK. 

I bet we’d be flabbergasted to find out how much they cost out of the factory door, I’d wager £100-150 at most for a £500 bass if it has to go via the USA. 
You’re paying a lot of money to get that “checked by our awesome techs in the USA” promise.

TBH I wouldn’t buy one new. There are so many decent used bases available (even just on BC) that I doubt that I will buy a new bass ever again.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Minininjarob said:

If the quality was good enough in their country of manufacture then they could just ship them to the countries to be sold direct - you’re paying duty to get them to the USA then again to the UK. 

I bet we’d be flabbergasted to find out how much they cost out of the factory door, I’d wager £100-150 at most for a £500 bass if it has to go via the USA. 
You’re paying a lot of money to get that “checked by our awesome techs in the USA” promise.

 

And if that promise were true, they must be checked by the kindergarden age progeny of the EBMM people who do that for the USA instruments. 

 

From early 2022 there's been issues with tuners with gears that chew themselves and stuck truss rods. They seem to be doing better again, but... there's no way somebody checked my Ray35, maybe they just went "yup, it's a bass, how many strings? Check"

I noticed the tuners straight away. Truss rod, the minute I went to adjust it. Fortunately the truss rod must have just had some glue or something because the old trick tapping along the back of the neck freed it. It's a great bass now, with Hipshot Untralites, but crazy expensive. I just wanted that particular finish so I didn't bother returning it once I found my experience was far from unique.

 

Initially SBMM seemed great but when the main guy, who used to post a lot on TB, left, it looks like they focused on pretty looks and not so much on the quality anymore.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 25/08/2024 at 11:56, tegs07 said:

Well they are either lying and the whole thing is a big conspiracy, or they are telling the truth and import duties plus economies of scale make the instruments more expensive in the UK.

If they do take them in to the US for QC declared as temporary import for export only, as long as no work is done which would  increase value, then there should be no US applied import taxes. That’s how it works in the UK anyway, I don’t imagine it would be any different over there as it would just be a waste of money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Cliff Edge said:

If they do take them in to the US for QC declared as temporary import for export only, as long as no work is done which would  increase value, then there should be no US applied import taxes. That’s how it works in the UK anyway, I don’t imagine it would be any different over there as it would just be a waste of money. 

 

Surely the fact that they get a quality control check in the US is done in an attempt to increase the perceived value of the instruments, otherwise there would be no point in doing it or publicising that they do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BigRedX said:

 

Surely the fact that they get a quality control check in the US is done in an attempt to increase the perceived value of the instruments, otherwise there would be no point in doing it or publicising that they do it.

 

You can shoot me for harbouring such an opinion, but as far as I'm concerned this is more for placating gear racists than acheiving higher quality.  

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BigRedX said:

 

Surely the fact that they get a quality control check in the US is done in an attempt to increase the perceived value of the instruments, otherwise there would be no point in doing it or publicising that they do it.

They publicise it so they must think it’s worth doing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with Neepheid on this, it's always smacked of placating people who don't trust that Asia can actually turn out instruments to proper spec, which is something that really only happens when you're too cheap to pay the factories properly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BigRedX said:

 

Surely the fact that they get a quality control check in the US is done in an attempt to increase the perceived value of the instruments, otherwise there would be no point in doing it or publicising that they do it.

It doesn't work for me . The perceived value is almost zero in my eyes .

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 04/09/2024 at 11:17, neepheid said:

 

You can shoot me for harbouring such an opinion, but as far as I'm concerned this is more for placating gear racists than acheiving higher quality.  

I would just like to say there should be no place for gear racism on this forum.

 

I haven't got any white basses, so I'm definitely not a gear racist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cato said: Pricing aside I'm slightly confused about the thinking behind this.

Is there that much demand for a passive Ray?

 

There must be, three different passive Rays this year.

 

As for the huge bridge, no one complains about the massive Ric bridge.🤔

 

Other than that, I can definitely see myself playing this one.

kw0vgalgs2rkxwcwhgdd.jpg

Edited by jd56hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 20/08/2024 at 06:01, eude said:

Sounds to me like they're expecting the UK to help artificially keep the domestic US price down.

Very good of them... :( 

That would certainly be enough to push me to picking up the Sire Z3 instead, only another £49 and a whole lot better value for money.

Thanks bit no thanks "Mr Ball".

Mr Ball has nothing to do with these. SBMM are owned, built, inventoried and warrantied by Praxis Musical instruments; they build copy instruments and pay a licensing fee to do so.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 23/08/2024 at 11:02, neepheid said:

 

Agree to disagree - it's bad enough when "they" simply take the $ and change the symbol to a £ - this is way beyond that (as are the pricing of all SBMM instruments).  I have heard it said that the EU uptick is because SBMM insist on having all their instruments made in Indonesia (or wherever) shipped back to USA for QC checks then distribute from there.  If that's true, then it's unnecessary double handling which we end up paying for, all probably to placate a few local racists who wouldn't buy an "import" bass unless it's been checked for ebola or something by a fellow countryperson who's automatically better at their quality assurance job than some foreign brown person.

 

Also - 20% import duty is way off the mark, it's about 5%.  I forget precisely what it is, but it's definitely a single digit, not 20.


This is true from what I've heard. It's really aggravating. Wonder if there's a way to buy direct from the factory. Sounds like they're around the same quality as Harley Benton and J&D anyway.

Edited by Roseweave
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...