danbb Posted November 4 Share Posted November 4 Boycott MM and get the new Sire V range. Way better quality, sound, parts and QC. Literally zero reason to buy MM in the UK now, unless you're buying the high end Ernie Ball stuff. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neepheid Posted November 4 Author Share Posted November 4 20 minutes ago, danbb said: Boycott MM and get the new Sire V range. Way better quality, sound, parts and QC. Literally zero reason to buy MM in the UK now, unless you're buying the high end Ernie Ball stuff. No time to say hi first? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tauzero Posted November 4 Share Posted November 4 1 hour ago, danbb said: Boycott MM and get the new Sire V range. Way better quality, sound, parts and QC. Literally zero reason to buy MM in the UK now, unless you're buying the high end Ernie Ball stuff. Surely the M or Z series would be a far more sensible option if you're after MM sound. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asingardenof Posted November 4 Share Posted November 4 6 hours ago, danbb said: Boycott MM and get the new Sire V range. Way better quality, sound, parts and QC. Literally zero reason to buy MM in the UK now, unless you're buying the high end Ernie Ball stuff. Sire have very much put a shot across the bow of SBMM. I'd been eyeing up a Ray5 as a possible future purchase, but other than it having a cooler headstock and the cachet of the model name there's no advantage to getting one rather than the Z3, given the Z3 is cheaper, better built and sounds more than a MM Stingray. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcnach Posted November 4 Share Posted November 4 9 hours ago, danbb said: Boycott MM and get the new Sire V range. Way better quality, sound, parts and QC. Literally zero reason to buy MM in the UK now, unless you're buying the high end Ernie Ball stuff. Erm... maybe the Z series, not the V, right? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcnach Posted November 4 Share Posted November 4 1 hour ago, asingardenof said: Sire have very much put a shot across the bow of SBMM. I'd been eyeing up a Ray5 as a possible future purchase, but other than it having a cooler headstock and the cachet of the model name there's no advantage to getting one rather than the Z3, given the Z3 is cheaper, better built and sounds more than a MM Stingray. If string spacing at the bridge matters to you, check it first. I think the Z3-5 is narrower spacing than the Z7-5 (the Z7-5 is 17.5mm, like a Stingray). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danbb Posted November 4 Share Posted November 4 (edited) Yeah I meant Z series not V Edited November 4 by danbb Type o Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asingardenof Posted November 5 Share Posted November 5 16 hours ago, mcnach said: If string spacing at the bridge matters to you, check it first. I think the Z3-5 is narrower spacing than the Z7-5 (the Z7-5 is 17.5mm, like a Stingray). I'd be surprised if that was the case, and would have thought they'd use the same for both like they have the same bridge across the V series, however I stand to be corrected. If it's a similar spacing to the SBMM Ray5 then I found that quite comfortable. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcnach Posted November 5 Share Posted November 5 43 minutes ago, asingardenof said: I'd be surprised if that was the case, and would have thought they'd use the same for both like they have the same bridge across the V series, however I stand to be corrected. If it's a similar spacing to the SBMM Ray5 then I found that quite comfortable. 16 mm is very common among the cheaper Stingray5 copies, and you can generally tell by looking at the pickups and the relative distances between polepieces, the polepiece diameter, and the pickup edges. On pictures the Z3-5 pickup looks to be for a narrower spacing than the Z7-5. Maybe the Z3 has an overall slimmer neck, much like SBMM do with their Ray4 vs Ray34 etc. I'm 87.4% convinced that the spacing is narrower, but I'm still waiting for an owner to confirm one way or the other. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patrikmarky Posted December 1 Share Posted December 1 Love mine ..for £349.00 from bax I can’t fault it ..curious about the bottom horn …was slightly put off by the stumpyness from the online pics ..but I’m pretty sure they’ve changed from the original mine seems slightly longer ..probably a pointless remark 🤟🤣.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russ Posted December 2 Share Posted December 2 (edited) 6 hours ago, patrikmarky said: Love mine ..for £349.00 from bax I can’t fault it ..curious about the bottom horn …was slightly put off by the stumpyness from the online pics ..but I’m pretty sure they’ve changed from the original mine seems slightly longer ..probably a pointless remark 🤟🤣.. Yep, they restyled the Z series before release because they got a lot of comments that the bottom horn on the pre-production models looked too "bulbous". Looks a lot better now. Nice to see a manufacturer taking feedback from customers before the instrument is even released! Although they've obviously ignored any and all calls for them to redesign their fugly headstock! Edited December 2 by Russ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neepheid Posted December 2 Author Share Posted December 2 (edited) 8 hours ago, Russ said: Yep, they restyled the Z series before release because they got a lot of comments that the bottom horn on the pre-production models looked too "bulbous". Looks a lot better now. Nice to see a manufacturer taking feedback from customers before the instrument is even released! Although they've obviously ignored any and all calls for them to redesign their fugly headstock! Look again - the headstock has been shortened and reprofiled a little on the Z with the tuners smooshed together a little closer. Still quintessentially theirs though, and I think that's a good thing, f the haters Measurements (D5 compared with Z7) Headstock length from nut to farthest edge D5 - 239mm Z7 - 208mm Centre of E tuner to centre of G tuner (approx) D5 - 145mm Z7 - 131mm Edited December 2 by neepheid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patrikmarky Posted December 2 Share Posted December 2 1 hour ago, neepheid said: Look again - the headstock has been shortened and reprofiled a little on the Z with the tuners smooshed together a little closer. Still quintessentially theirs though, and I think that's a good thing, f the haters Measurements (D5 compared with Z7) Headstock length from nut to farthest edge D5 - 239mm Z7 - 208mm Centre of E tuner to centre of G tuner (approx) D5 - 145mm Z7 - 131mm Personally think it looks better than the Ernie ball with the slightly longer bottom horn ..as for the headstock it is an improvement but I think they could have gone further..I’m so tempted to take my orbital sander to it ..🤟😂..I have upgraded my tuners to black and put a clear pick guard on it ..I’ll probably do the bridge and plate black .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neepheid Posted December 2 Author Share Posted December 2 4 minutes ago, patrikmarky said: Personally think it looks better than the Ernie ball with the slightly longer bottom horn ..as for the headstock it is an improvement but I think they could have gone further..I’m so tempted to take my orbital sander to it ..🤟😂..I have upgraded my tuners to black and put a clear pick guard on it ..I’ll probably do the bridge and plate black .. It's your bass... and I'm with you on the clear pickguard - I'm about to send my Z7's guard to earlpilanz for copying - I wanna see more of that burgundy (mist) and the routing around the pickups is surprisingly tight considering it was designed to be covered up - no swimming pools here! Personally, I'm glad they have kept their headstock. It's part of their identity. Compared to some of the utterly ridiculous monstrosities that exist in the world (which I'm sure are designed with the express purpose of ending up on "worst headstock ever" type threads/posts), the Sire headstock is pretty innocuous and I really don't get why people dogpile on it. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drTStingray Posted December 3 Share Posted December 3 (edited) On 04/11/2024 at 09:42, danbb said: Boycott MM and get the new Sire V range. Way better quality, sound, parts and QC. Literally zero reason to buy MM in the UK now, unless you're buying the high end Ernie Ball stuff. Not from some of the pics I’ve seen (in Sire threads on here and also Talkbass) - some have horrifically tatty looking construction in terms of neck joints and necks. I’m also confused - I thought this was an SBMM thread concerning their new lines of basses but the last page has been purely about Sire cheapo copy Stingrayish basses which are nothing to do with them (or did I miss some instruction somewhere that threads like this and Fender threads should be bombed with discussion about cheap knock off copies?) 🥴😂 Surely the best way to get Stingray sounds on a budget is with the officially licensed product??!! Edited December 3 by drTStingray 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neepheid Posted December 3 Author Share Posted December 3 5 hours ago, drTStingray said: Not from some of the pics I’ve seen (in Sire threads on here and also Talkbass) - some have horrifically tatty looking construction in terms of neck joints and necks. I’m also confused - I thought this was an SBMM thread concerning their new lines of basses but the last page has been purely about Sire cheapo copy Stingrayish basses which are nothing to do with them (or did I miss some instruction somewhere that threads like this and Fender threads should be bombed with discussion about cheap knock off copies?) 🥴😂 Surely the best way to get Stingray sounds on a budget is with the officially licensed product??!! You're talking to thin air - first post, one follow up, hasn't been back since. Anyway, back on topic - UK/EU price gouging 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ossyrocks Posted December 7 Share Posted December 7 (edited) Just a heads up. I played one of these yesterday at Promenade Music in Morecambe. Gary thrust it into my hands and said play this! He reckons it's the best playing bass in the shop. ....and it was £250. Edit: hmm, not sure now, as I'm sure the one I played had a control plate and was active. I don't understand MM models at all! Rob Edited December 7 by ossyrocks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BassApprentice Posted December 7 Share Posted December 7 That sounds like one of the SUB series, which was the previous base level model. They aren't bad by any means but I think this thread makes us question what value you get from paying full RRP from Music Man, whatever series or model you buy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rwillett Posted December 7 Share Posted December 7 56 minutes ago, ossyrocks said: Just a heads up. I played one of these yesterday at Promenade Music in Morecambe. Gary thrust it into my hands and said play this! He reckons it's the best playing bass in the shop. ....and it was £250. Edit: hmm, not sure now, as I'm sure the one I played had a control plate and was active. I don't understand MM models at all! Rob Rob, Dangerous place to go unless your credit cards are locked away. Then again £250 isn't a bad price, however must resist the temptation. Oddly enough I am down that way tomorrow, coaching girls rugby at Vale of Lune Rugby club. Vale of Lune is a left turn at McDonalds as opposed to a right turn to Morecambe. Thankfully Promenade Music is closed on a Sunday, so I can't accidentality go there. Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russ Posted December 7 Share Posted December 7 On 02/12/2024 at 21:33, drTStingray said: I’m also confused - I thought this was an SBMM thread concerning their new lines of basses but the last page has been purely about Sire cheapo copy Stingrayish basses which are nothing to do with them (or did I miss some instruction somewhere that threads like this and Fender threads should be bombed with discussion about cheap knock off copies?) 🥴😂 We're allowed to digress where relevant, and it's definitely relevant, when Sire are doing a better lower-priced MM-style bass than MM themselves. On 02/12/2024 at 21:33, drTStingray said: Surely the best way to get Stingray sounds on a budget is with the officially licensed product??!! The Z series sound more like a proper Stingray than any of the Sterling range, whether it's the new cheap ones or the more expensive ones. There were similar discussions back in the day when Ibanez came out with the ATK range, which sounded much more Stingray-ish than the "official" lower-priced Stingrays of the time, the OLP range. On the upside, maybe this will encourage MM to up their game. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ossyrocks Posted December 7 Share Posted December 7 21 minutes ago, rwillett said: Rob, Dangerous place to go unless your credit cards are locked away. Then again £250 isn't a bad price, however must resist the temptation. Oddly enough I am down that way tomorrow, coaching girls rugby at Vale of Lune Rugby club. Vale of Lune is a left turn at McDonalds as opposed to a right turn to Morecambe. Thankfully Promenade Music is closed on a Sunday, so I can't accidentality go there. Rob I've just come back from Promenade Music this minute (I can't stay away!). They have two vintage 70's Precisions in, a '74 and a '76. Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ezbass Posted December 7 Share Posted December 7 23 minutes ago, Russ said: We're allowed to digress where relevant, This is BC, it is the way (sometimes it’s not even relevant ). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tauzero Posted December 10 Share Posted December 10 On 07/12/2024 at 15:12, Russ said: We're allowed to digress where relevant The more highly trained of us can go off-topic within the first post of a thread. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.