Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Shergold Telstar Bass - Short Scale


MichaelDean
 Share

Recommended Posts

These look fun! 30" scale, two humbuckers, matching headstocks, roasted maple neck, laurel fingerboard, poplar body. The website claims a weight of around 3.6kg and £449.

 

Controls are apparenlty Volume, Tone, Master Tone. Seems like a possible mistake on the website - unless they've done the Keanu wiring?

https://www.shergoldguitars.com/the-basses/telstar-bass.html

sbt14bk-thumbnail.pngsbt14cg-thumbnail_1.png

Edited by MichaelDean
Spelling
  • Like 11
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting looking bass. Wonder what the bridge string spacing is? It looks like 19mm, given the standard parts bin type bridge. The only let down for me is the slab body with no contouring (as far as I can tell from the pics). Reasonable price point though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks great. But I think it falls into the trap that lots of short scale basses tend to, in that the pickups are too widely spaced so that the bridge is a bit nasal and the neck is wooly. Together it's a bit hollow. I will need to check one out for myself obviously but I'm not loving the sounds in the demos.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, ped said:

Looks great. But I think it falls into the trap that lots of short scale basses tend to, in that the pickups are too widely spaced so that the bridge is a bit nasal and the neck is wooly. Together it's a bit hollow. I will need to check one out for myself obviously but I'm not loving the sounds in the demos.

 

If there is the option to wire both pickups in series then it has the potential to sound excellent. My old Burns Sonic had pickups in similar positions and due to the nature of the selector switch having both on wired them in series. This was the only sound I used because it was so good.

 

On the other hand I really don't like the "Telecaster" style shape and from my experience I don't find it particularly well suited to bass guitars. I don't know why this new iteration of Shergold simply don't reissue their old models with less dense wood for the bodies. Surely that's what their target audience wants?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, MichaelDean said:

I think it must be a mistake with the controls based on this YT video. Must be VBT or VVT.
 

 

Now that is how you demo a bass. Neck pickup fully open with a pick sounds glorious.

20 hours ago, ped said:

Looks great. But I think it falls into the trap that lots of short scale basses tend to, in that the pickups are too widely spaced so that the bridge is a bit nasal and the neck is wooly. Together it's a bit hollow. I will need to check one out for myself obviously but I'm not loving the sounds in the demos.

That's just why I like it! That pickup placement works very well for me on a shortscale. But then, I'm a sucker for old school plonky tones 😄

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/11/2024 at 16:03, BigRedX said:

 

 

 

 

On the other hand I really don't like the "Telecaster" style shape and from my experience I don't find it particularly well suited to bass guitars. I don't know why this new iteration of Shergold simply don't reissue their old models with less dense wood for the bodies. Surely that's what their target audience wants?

 

 

I'd agree with both of those opinions.   I assume they were probably trying to make the design sufficiently different from the Wilcock Mullarkey; itself very derivative of the original Shergold body design, with the DNA that led to the Wal Pro basses.     A bass version of their new Masquerader guitar would be quite tasty, mind.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shaggy said:

I assume they were probably trying to make the design sufficiently different from the Wilcock Mullarkey; itself very derivative of the original Shergold body design, with the DNA that led to the Wal Pro basses. 

 

Crazy isn't it mate, they could have done something so iconic given those three legacy connections, and they produce something that looks like a B- school project :( 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/11/2024 at 12:46, Cato said:

The equivalent skinny stringers seem to be highly regarded for the price bracket,as a lover of all things tele shaped I've been tempted myself, purely based on the aesthetic.

The guitarist in my fun band has one, he loves it and even for a duff guitarist like me it seem to play really well.  The original Shergolds were based on the old Hayman designs (2020?).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Chienmortbb said:

The guitarist in my fun band has one, he loves it and even for a duff guitarist like me it seem to play really well.  

 

My memory of the older Patrick Eggle instruments is that the guitars were very decent indeed; the basses (Milan etc) looked nice but were sonically pretty bland.  These don't even look nice; a shame as the original Shergolds always looked classy.

 

Edited by Shaggy
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...