Jean-Luc Pickguard Posted Tuesday at 10:00 Share Posted Tuesday at 10:00 I've always liked the look of a stingray, but have not been tempted to aquire on as I mostly play short scale basses, and I don't get on with active electronics. When I heard about the (passive) short scale stingrays I checked out the sterling version online thinking it would be more to my taste, but the metrics just look a little off, so I decided it wasn't for me after all. Yesterday a short scale musicman stingray appeared onscreen when I was idly looking at ebay and it doesn't look oddly proportioned like the Sterling. Am I imagining things or do the metrics of the EBMM look way better than the Sterling by MM version? In addition to the better proportioned bridge, it looks like the US version might be using a smaller control plate where the Sterling uses a full size control plate as used on the long scale basses. Whenever I see the Sterling version I can't unsee how oddly large the control plate appears to be — it reminds me of a toddler stomping around in his dad's boots. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alittlebitrobot Posted Tuesday at 11:17 Share Posted Tuesday at 11:17 I completely agree that the full-size control plate on the Sterling looks off. Obviously it's an economical decision on their part but it does look squeezed. One other thing that might be an issue here; I brought these images into Photoshop and there's a decent amount of camera distortion on the EBMM which is pretty normal when photographing something this size. The fact that there's none on the Sterling makes me think that the headstock in that photo has been replaced digitally. It just adds to the subtle feeling that something's a bit off. I think you'd have to compare them in person to really know what you think about the Sterling. ....I'd gladly have one if it was going to waste.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
martthebass Posted Tuesday at 15:33 Share Posted Tuesday at 15:33 I concur on the control plate - think it looks hemmed in. After many months of searching for a EBMM Shortie I finally gave up and bought a used Sterling (and a new EBMM Darkray...) and to be honest it doesn't look that 'unbalanced' in the flesh. As you'd expect quality isn't exactly EBMM though.......functional I'd call it. Having said that, the sound is pretty much like the EBMM (watch the Andertons YT Vid) and it's a great little player. It just does without the comp nut, shaped neck pocket and hand oiled/waxed neck but it is a quarter of the price. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aidan63 Posted Tuesday at 19:26 Share Posted Tuesday at 19:26 (edited) @ash is selling one, doesn't look as extreme as that blue one Edited Tuesday at 19:26 by Aidan63 @ function 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
songofthewind Posted Tuesday at 19:30 Share Posted Tuesday at 19:30 Is it me, or does the headstock on the Sterling version look much larger? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Count Bassy Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago If you scale the black one to 105% the two overlay each other almost exactly, except for: The head which does seem to be a bit bigger on the Sterling, The tuners themself which seem significantly bigger on the Sterling. The control plate which is bigger on the sterling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.