Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 10/12/2024 at 22:44, meterman said:

I haven't got any decent pictures of it, but surely someone's going to post the original cut-down homemade bass that Bill Wyman made (Dallas-Arbiter with the frets pulled out?) in the early 60's that had a hilariously bad DIY pickguard.
 

Same goes for some of the early (late 50's / early 60's UK made basses. And some late 60's or early 70's plywood MIJ basses too. The pre-lawsuit "we're not really sure what we're doing but we're doing it anyway" ones. Teisco were repeat offenders. IMG_0890.thumb.jpeg.bdcca60bb8014c957d043252ec08b6e0.jpeg
 

Italian company Meazzi also made some pretty wild looking basses, the Jupiter models in particular. I sort of admire their Italian bonkers-ness in a way.

IMG_0891.thumb.jpeg.8ab441fbd02eaf6b32ca52cabb1e1c88.jpeg

Expand  

Now those are really awful!

Posted
  On 11/12/2024 at 23:23, MartinB said:

 

As someone who mostly plays Jazz necks, the word I would use is "chunky"

Expand  

Thanks for that info.

My #1 bass is EBMM USA Sterling and of my 4 precisions, 3 of them have J necks....I suspect then I wouldn't get on with the Eastwood.

Saved me making an expensive mistake.

 

 

Posted
  On 12/12/2024 at 13:25, Bolo said:

This is turning into a "great scratchplates" thread. I love it!

Expand  

 

There is no such thing as a great scratchplate, only a marginally less offensive scratchplate.

Posted
  On 12/12/2024 at 16:55, tauzero said:

 

There is no such thing as a great scratchplate, only a marginally less offensive scratchplate.

Expand  

Unless it is tort, in which case it is innately magical and brilliant 

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 10/12/2024 at 14:53, tauzero said:

 

I like the Variax one. My own Variax is sunburst with tort though. I've also got a Ray5 which is very like the second one. None of the other 30 or so have pickguards. Still, to add to the ugly pickguards:

 

precision-deluxe-2010.jpg

 

and especially

 

fender-telecaster-bass-bk-zx1200.jpg

 

 

Expand  

10 years ago I'd have slammed me nadgers in a drawer rather than play a bass with a '51 style scratch plate, but now I quite like them. Especially when they're sexed up a bit like this: 

DSCN3300.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 12/12/2024 at 21:29, MichaelDean said:

This one is bad. Hutchins Beachcomber. Nothing flows and the whole thing looks a bit lumpy. 

 

Screenshot_20241212-212722.thumb.png.ebef08fdd2c367fdca7294dac76a3e10.png

Expand  

 

Aside from the ugly tort, I think this one's pretty decent. It follows the outline of the body properly, unlike a lot of the disasters in this thread. Just needs a little tweak in the area next to the neck:

image.thumb.png.97cd350d48533671b3d5809f145cea77.png

Posted

Don't get me wrong - I like a nice tort. That one just isn't a nice tort 😆. It's dull, and too red to go with the blue paint. I'd want a much darker brown with more pattern  - but an off-white pickguard would be better still.

  • Like 1
Posted

Beyond the shape of the pickguard, when talking about tort pickguards it is unfair to lump it all together as there is a huge difference between beautiful tort and fugly tort.

 

Beautiful tort:

IMG_3168.jpg

 

Fugly tort:

IMG_5653.jpg

  • Like 7
Posted
  On 13/12/2024 at 10:44, Jean-Luc Pickguard said:

Beyond the shape of the pickguard, when talking about tort pickguards it is unfair to lump it all together as there is a huge difference between beautiful tort and fugly tort.

 

Beautiful tort:

IMG_3168.jpg

 

Fugly tort:

IMG_5653.jpg

Expand  

Isn’t the top one “old tort” which contained horrendous chemicals and isn’t legal to make any more using those ingredients and methods? A somewhat unfair comparison I feel 

Posted
  On 13/12/2024 at 11:07, Geek99 said:

Isn’t the top one “old tort” which contained horrendous chemicals and isn’t legal to make any more using those ingredients and methods? A somewhat unfair comparison I feel 

Expand  

 

I apologise unreservedly to all aesthetically challenged tort pickguards for the unfair comparison.

Posted
  On 13/12/2024 at 11:39, Jean-Luc Pickguard said:

 

I apologise unreservedly to all aesthetically challenged tort pickguards for the unfair comparison.

Expand  

I wasn’t questioning your taste, and I’d agree however its not easy to make tort that’s quite as nice these days was what was made years ago 

Posted
  On 13/12/2024 at 11:07, Geek99 said:

Isn’t the top one “old tort” which contained horrendous chemicals and isn’t legal to make any more using those ingredients and methods? A somewhat unfair comparison I feel 

Expand  

 

Cheap ebay/amazon ones often look pretty vintage.

Posted

I don't like pickguards. However, I do tolerate them on P-Basses, as they accommodate pots and socket. But NO tort, please!

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
  On 13/12/2024 at 10:44, Jean-Luc Pickguard said:

Beyond the shape of the pickguard, when talking about tort pickguards it is unfair to lump it all together as there is a huge difference between beautiful tort and fugly tort.

 

Beautiful tort:

IMG_3168.jpg

 

Fugly tort:

IMG_5653.jpg

Expand  

 

You have that inverted. The first is hideous. The second is acceptable.

Posted
  On 13/12/2024 at 11:39, Jean-Luc Pickguard said:

 

I apologise unreservedly to all aesthetically challenged tort pickguards for the unfair comparison.

Expand  

 

By its nature there is no such thing as a non aesthetically challenged tort pickguard, so it is a fair comparison!

I assumed what you meant in your photos were 'ugly tort' and 'photocopy of an ugly tort'

 

 

Posted
  On 13/12/2024 at 10:44, Jean-Luc Pickguard said:

Beyond the shape of the pickguard, when talking about tort pickguards it is unfair to lump it all together as there is a huge difference between beautiful tort and fugly tort.

 

Beautiful tort:

IMG_3168.jpg

 

Fugly tort:

IMG_5653.jpg

Expand  

Definitely, the depth of the colour in the 60s and early 70s ones is amazing when you look up close , the bottom one looks dreadful 

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 13/12/2024 at 11:07, Geek99 said:

Isn’t the top one “old tort” which contained horrendous chemicals and isn’t legal to make any more using those ingredients and methods? A somewhat unfair comparison I feel 

Expand  

Same thing with certain vintage drum kits that came in amazing coloured wrap. Often the old wraps were beautiful, but also highly flammable, and the modern day equivalents are really difficult to match the old vintage ones. Especially the oyster pearl finishes, or moirés, even some of the Ludwig Strata or Slingerland Onyx finishes are notoriously hard to replicate.

 

Decent vintage tort, however awful the chemicals involved were, can be spectacular when you find a good example on the right bass 👍

  • Like 2
Posted

The originals were celluloid. It is highly flammable (inflammable in the US) and shtinks over the decades.

 

There's plenty of nice modern tort out there.

 

Cheap modern eBay tobreplace broken 80s Japanese:

Maya.thumb.jpg.79fb4f7050780bfaaa7ea10f9507a17a.jpg

 

2019 Fender roadworn:

2101425488_LlannrhymneyBLAboutTime(3).thumb.jpg.31a01d8211e95c382bc093445e696e24.jpg

 

1980s Hohner, has since faded to an amazing volour but don't have a photo:

302009247_10159784521533346_1139410214348665833_n.thumb.jpg.9addb3a512b56e54ffbd65bdb83fe9f0.jpg

 

60s Fender

20240731_223512.thumb.jpg.6069818c18bc9457100f7293a3ae9573.jpg

 

Fender repro of 60s, allowing for different light very close to the one above:

FB_IMG_1702810078419.thumb.jpg.21daff38f007061f49ac3afcd4d8bb3c.jpg

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...