BassApprentice Posted Tuesday at 19:36 Posted Tuesday at 19:36 (edited) Yes, if you don't like the basses or the band, you aren't being forced to buy one or comment on it. However this is a fun change to the whole signature bass model. I wouldn't have stumped up for the full USA model prices, but now all three are available as Sterling models in both the natural and the black for the next 2 months...I avoided the first batch but I'm going to have a tough time not buying a Joe Dart 2 in the Natural this time round. £575 all in. Yes the shipping is still a farce. Sad they haven't managed to find a way but at least the cost is fully upfront. Edited Tuesday at 19:43 by BassApprentice 1 1 Quote
FugaziBomb Posted Tuesday at 20:06 Posted Tuesday at 20:06 (edited) I always wonder if these passive music man models are successful for the company in terms of sales. It just seems so weird to me to take a Stingray bass and strip it of the things that make it special - the preamp and the humbucker. I had the same thought when they were making the Cutlass and Caprice basses. Adding some kind of preamp in there that plays to the legacy of the company seemed to be the obvious choice to me. I'm just one guy, though, and I'm sure market analysis shows trends are different than my own opinions. Still, I would have really dug a Caprice with the classic 2 band preamp as a feature. Edited Tuesday at 20:06 by FugaziBomb Quote
BassApprentice Posted Tuesday at 20:20 Author Posted Tuesday at 20:20 Well they sold out of the all the US models first couple of times round, and they sold 4,500 of the first batch of the Joe Dart Sterlings. It's a testament to the Vulfpeck marketing machine that they can keep repeating this and I can't say EBMM will be complaining! 1 Quote
Kyndainverse Posted Tuesday at 20:24 Posted Tuesday at 20:24 I’m not a Joe Dart fan. But there is something very appealing to me about the III in black. 1 Quote
neepheid Posted Tuesday at 22:21 Posted Tuesday at 22:21 2 hours ago, BassApprentice said: Yes, if you don't like the basses or the band, you aren't being forced to buy one or comment on it. Umm, u ok hun? 1 Quote
bassist_lewis Posted yesterday at 06:05 Posted yesterday at 06:05 Quite likely I'll put this on the credit card and it will conveniently show up after my wedding. So it'll look to the new Mrs Bassist as if I was being responsible with my money 👍 2 Quote
fretmeister Posted yesterday at 09:39 Posted yesterday at 09:39 I am in serious negotiations with MrsF. Just the single bucker in natural will do for me. Quote
LeftyJ Posted yesterday at 09:41 Posted yesterday at 09:41 13 hours ago, FugaziBomb said: I always wonder if these passive music man models are successful for the company in terms of sales. It just seems so weird to me to take a Stingray bass and strip it of the things that make it special - the preamp and the humbucker. Some early Stingray prototypes had a reverse P pickup in the MM pickup position. So indeed absolutely nothing like on the Joe Dart shorty, but it's not weird either. 2 Quote
Floyd Pepper Posted yesterday at 09:49 Posted yesterday at 09:49 13 hours ago, FugaziBomb said: I always wonder if these passive music man models are successful for the company in terms of sales. It just seems so weird to me to take a Stingray bass and strip it of the things that make it special - the preamp and the humbucker. I had the same thought when they were making the Cutlass and Caprice basses. Adding some kind of preamp in there that plays to the legacy of the company seemed to be the obvious choice to me. I'm just one guy, though, and I'm sure market analysis shows trends are different than my own opinions. Still, I would have really dug a Caprice with the classic 2 band preamp as a feature. I took a punt and got one of the original Sterling JD's last year and I've been super impressed with it as I prefer passive basses. So much so, that I also got a Pete Wentz (Even though I'd never heard of him) passive Stingray after hearing this clip - 2 Quote
Kev Posted yesterday at 09:51 Posted yesterday at 09:51 I'd still like one of these, but its £399 odd for a Ray 4 (closest core line bass) and that one comes with an active preamp. £575 is just too much for what it is, which is a shame. Quote
BassApprentice Posted yesterday at 10:08 Author Posted yesterday at 10:08 15 minutes ago, Kev said: £575 is just too much for what it is, which is a shame. And that's the debate I am still having here. I like them, they are cool, but having the base range components for that price is a smidge too high. If they just had the nicer bridge, I'd probably be much more keen. 2 Quote
Cato Posted yesterday at 11:24 Posted yesterday at 11:24 (edited) If it wasn't for the £200 shipping I'd be very tempted to get a JD1 and maybe see if I could get a preamp fitted at somepoint down the road. At £393 they look like a bargain. At closer to £600 not so much. Edited yesterday at 19:25 by Cato 1 Quote
fretmeister Posted yesterday at 12:07 Posted yesterday at 12:07 I have wifely permission! Bow before my negotiation skills! (Also, I have to do a lot of DIY round the house). 4 Quote
Highfox Posted yesterday at 12:27 Posted yesterday at 12:27 €754 to here. I think I'll skip it. Quote
ezbass Posted yesterday at 16:00 Posted yesterday at 16:00 Even with the shipping and taxes, the newer one is still one of the cheapest, ‘name brand’, short scale, P basses available. If the nut width was wider, I’d be having a long hard think about a black one. Quote
fretmeister Posted yesterday at 16:30 Posted yesterday at 16:30 4 hours ago, fretmeister said: I have wifely permission! Bow before my negotiation skills! (Also, I have to do a lot of DIY round the house). Might not be as easy as I thought. The proper USA ones are usually between 7lb and 7.5lb, but it seems that the Sterlings are much closer to 9lb, and unfortunately that's too much for me these days. All but 1 of my basses are under 7lb. aaarrrrgggghhhhhh Quote
Vanheusen77 Posted yesterday at 17:30 Posted yesterday at 17:30 I like the look of them, but I agree the idea of a passive stingray is a bit wierd. Again, I love the purist conceptual part of it, but in reality the sound you hear on Vulfpeck records sounds like it has a massive low frequency eq boost. Same thing with a passive J on the back pickup only. It’s a sound that’s cool in theory but for most practical purposes it’s just not supportive enough without a lot of processing. But what do I know? Jaco didn’t let any of this stop him! 1 Quote
fretmeister Posted yesterday at 17:45 Posted yesterday at 17:45 It’s a Sterling not a stingray. And it’s actually inspired by an old passive copy of one that Vulfpeck had, that they particularly liked for recording. So other than things like EVH’s frankenstrat it’s about the first signature model based on something dirt cheap. 1 Quote
Vanheusen77 Posted yesterday at 17:54 Posted yesterday at 17:54 8 minutes ago, fretmeister said: So other than things like EVH’s frankenstrat it’s about the first signature model based on something dirt cheap. I love this concept! Quote
AlexDelores Posted yesterday at 18:00 Posted yesterday at 18:00 The JDSterlings have just made these things by On Guitars look too complicated. Are we living in the minimalist bass era now? I don’t hate it tbh! Quote
BassApprentice Posted yesterday at 20:36 Author Posted yesterday at 20:36 Well as of 30 seconds ago, this will now cost you 10% more. So over £600. I'm out. Cheers Donald, ya balding orange buffoon. 1 Quote
fretmeister Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 10 hours ago, BassApprentice said: Well as of 30 seconds ago, this will now cost you 10% more. So over £600. I'm out. Cheers Donald, ya balding orange buffoon. I've just looked at my basket - it's gone down to £566.36. Probably due exchange rate alterations. Until UK tariffs are done in retaliation it shouldn't affect us. USA tariffs don't affect us buying USA goods. We'll need our own tariffs for that. Quote
Cato Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 1 hour ago, fretmeister said: Until UK tariffs are done in retaliation it shouldn't affect us. USA tariffs don't affect us buying USA goods. We'll need our own tariffs for that. Not sure about that. I think it may depend on whether the basses are imported into the US before they are exported to British buyers. There's not a lot of detail yet on exactly how the tariffs will be implemented or whether there will be an exemption for foreign buyers in the above scenario. Might be a while before we find out. Quote
fretmeister Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago That depends on whether US companies making things outside of the US are covered. If there was anyone mentally competent / stable in the White House that isn't a pet we'd know that already. Quote
Cato Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago (edited) 10 minutes ago, fretmeister said: That depends on whether US companies making things outside of the US are covered. My understanding is that US companies who manufacture outside the US are one of the main targets. I was reading somwthing earlier about US running shoe manufacturers, who dominate the global market but who almost exclusively manufacture in Asia, being amongst those at the very sharp end of the tariffs in the US market. https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/us-tariffs-vietnam-would-be-blow-nike-other-sportswear-brands-2025-04-01/ But it's early days & I'm not sure anyone, posibly including those in the Whitehouse, really knows how this is going to work yet Edited 11 hours ago by Cato Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.