Jean-Luc Pickguard Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago (edited) You can now upload a photo to Chat GPT and pompt it to generate an image based on that image including adding musical instruments and specifying the person in the image to be shown as a puppet. eg I uploaded a headshot and entered the prompt: Quote Please produce a picture of the person in the photo attached as a puppet playing a black four string rickenbacker 4003 bass guitar with a white pickguard. So let's see your you as a muppet. Here's mine Edited 14 hours ago by Jean-Luc Pickguard 5 1 Quote
Burns-bass Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago This stuff is all good fun but we’re ripping off the intellectual property of huge numbers of people doing this. ChatGPT aren’t paying to license this. Neither did they pay Studio Ghib for the manga stuff and a near limitless number of other things they’ve stolen. It’s fun and a I enjoy seeing the results, but ultimately, it’s theft, however the AI guys want to dress it up. 9 Quote
Buddster Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago Oh my lordy, whay have you started! I'm sure I dont look that old... Quote
Bolo Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago Besides the IP theft each query takes a tonne of energy to process. Like a Cummins diesel rolling coal compared to a lean euro6 for a regular search engine query. 1 Quote
Paul S Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 8 hours ago, Buddster said: Oh my lordy, whay have you started! I'm sure I dont look that old... Where did the teacup full of dry catfood come into it? 1 3 Quote
Downunderwonder Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 9 minutes ago, Paul S said: Where did the teacup full of dry catfood come into it? It's a cup of coffee [beans]. Nobody ever accused AI of being smart. Quote
ezbass Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 3 hours ago, Paul S said: Where did the teacup full of dry catfood come into it? That was exactly my reaction. Quote
prowla Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 12 hours ago, Burns-bass said: This stuff is all good fun but we’re ripping off the intellectual property of huge numbers of people doing this. ChatGPT aren’t paying to license this. Neither did they pay Studio Ghib for the manga stuff and a near limitless number of other things they’ve stolen. It’s fun and a I enjoy seeing the results, but ultimately, it’s theft, however the AI guys want to dress it up. Why is it theft - are the products/services being used subject to licence fees? (I don't know, just asking...) Quote
Buddster Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 3 hours ago, Paul S said: Where did the teacup full of dry catfood come into it? I didn't actually specify to add coffee/cat food, but in my profile I've added coffee as a like, so I guess AI went off script and added a cup of cat food. 1 Quote
Dad3353 Posted 55 minutes ago Posted 55 minutes ago 31 minutes ago, prowla said: Why is it theft - are the products/services being used subject to licence fees? (I don't know, just asking...) The term 'Muppet' is owned by Disney and/or Henson, and anything that resembles any Muppet character could be subject to litigation. 1 Quote
itu Posted 48 minutes ago Posted 48 minutes ago 13 hours ago, Buddster said: Oh my lordy, whay have you started! I'm sure I dont look that old... Four... and three strings? Quote
prowla Posted 45 minutes ago Posted 45 minutes ago Just now, Dad3353 said: The term 'Muppet' is owned by Disney and/or Henson, and anything that resembles any Muppet character could be subject to litigation. Ah - the word muppet (I was thinking about the tech)... I hadn't realised it was that old, but the term, "marionette" + "puppet", was first used by Jim Henson in 1955. The point does bring up an interesting question, though: if the developers of the system don't code in the word "muppet" and the request is to "draw me like a puppet", where is the infringement? Quote
Dad3353 Posted 41 minutes ago Posted 41 minutes ago Just now, prowla said: Ah - the word muppet (I was thinking about the tech)... I hadn't realised it was that old, but the term, "marionette" + "puppet", was first used by Jim Henson in 1955. The point does bring up an interesting question, though: if the developers of the system don't code in the word "muppet" and the request is to "draw me like a puppet", where is the infringement? If there was a demonstratable likeness to any Muppet character, one would have to argue one's case against a battery of highfaluting Disney lawyers with deep pockets. Whether one wins or not could be independent of the rights or wrongs of the case, just the finances engaged. Such is Justice in these realms. 1 Quote
Dood Posted 4 minutes ago Posted 4 minutes ago That’s actually very good. cGPT has managed to recreate my video review set in pretty incredible detail, not to mention the great big muppet sat front and centre. Quote
LukeFRC Posted 1 minute ago Posted 1 minute ago 1 hour ago, prowla said: Why is it theft - are the products/services being used subject to licence fees? (I don't know, just asking...) AI isn’t smart, it just copies existing things - and the image libraries they are copying (like a regular google image search) mostly have copywrite held by someone else. Either a company or artist (imagine an image of Daffy Duck or David Hockney image) or owned by someone else (my holiday snaps of my kids meeting Daffy Duck at Disneyland or Tate gallery’s photo of a Hockney image) so while AI could make me look like Daffy Duck in a hockney photo - it has no right to the images it’s training itself on. which isn’t good. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.