andy. Posted August 27, 2009 Posted August 27, 2009 Im torn. Has anyone had experience with both of these basses? I cant decide which i like better and kinda need to because i sadly cant afford both. I need to know more about them so i can got one ordered to a shop to try. Cheers! Je Osbourn - [url="http://www.lakland.com/osborn.htm"]http://www.lakland.com/osborn.htm[/url] 4-94 - [url="http://www.lakland.com/4-94.htm"]http://www.lakland.com/4-94.htm[/url] Quote
niceguyhomer Posted August 28, 2009 Posted August 28, 2009 I've had both and there's no real comparison really. My 4-94 was a beautiful looking bass that sounded fantastic but I got nervous every time somebody went near it which I know is daft but I sold it because of that. The Joe is a solid work tool that'll do the job perfectly and for a long time. My advice? Buy a Darryl Jones Quote
JTUK Posted August 28, 2009 Posted August 28, 2009 If I were looking at Laklands then the JO or DJ models interest me most... Not a fan of soapbars and I think these models are a very good take on a jazz... Quote
Bass Culture Posted August 28, 2009 Posted August 28, 2009 I know this is stating the bleeding obvious but another pretty fundamental difference - to my mind - is that the JO and DJ are passive. The 4-94 is active...I'll get my coat. Quote
chris_b Posted August 28, 2009 Posted August 28, 2009 If you can, try them. In my opinion the JO's, DJ's and 94's are equally great basses. They can have different pickups and electrics but I think they are each flexible enough to get the sound you want, so you really have to try. I brought mine before the JO's and DJ's appeared, but it wouldn't bother me which one I owned, I think they are all that good. Quote
fatboytoo Posted August 28, 2009 Posted August 28, 2009 (edited) How's about a 44-02? Got a DJ, JO and 44-02. A/Bd 44-94 and 44-02 and had a very hard time justifying the price difference between them. Tone/sound and general fit and finish was so close, confident I'd made the right choice of a 44-02 and saved myself enough for a decent Japanese JB too... Love the JO and the DJ (both Skylines BTW) and both have their place, but ultimately the 44-02 is that bit more versatile and it's the one I'd go for if the house was on fire! Regards Rich Edit! - ultimately, try before you buy (if you can!) Edited August 28, 2009 by fatboytoo Quote
grahamd Posted August 30, 2009 Posted August 30, 2009 [quote name='fatboytoo' post='583302' date='Aug 28 2009, 10:28 AM']How's about a 44-02? Got a DJ, JO and 44-02. A/Bd 44-94 and 44-02 and had a very hard time justifying the price difference between them. Tone/sound and general fit and finish was so close, confident I'd made the right choice of a 44-02 and saved myself enough for a decent Japanese JB too... Love the JO and the DJ (both Skylines BTW) and both have their place, but ultimately the 44-02 is that bit more versatile and it's the one I'd go for if the house was on fire! Regards Rich Edit! - ultimately, try before you buy (if you can!)[/quote] thanks for that. How do the necks compare on 4402 and dj? Quote
fatboytoo Posted August 30, 2009 Posted August 30, 2009 Very similar, as in I can't tell the difference (both seem to be same widths and profiles at nut and 12th). Quote
andy. Posted August 30, 2009 Author Posted August 30, 2009 I would prefer a passive bass because i have an active one but the fact that you can get more tones out of the 4-94 is tempting. What is the JO like when you really pluck hard? Is there any clipping? Quote
fatboytoo Posted September 1, 2009 Posted September 1, 2009 [quote name='andy.' post='585289' date='Aug 30 2009, 06:26 PM']I would prefer a passive bass because i have an active one but the fact that you can get more tones out of the 4-94 is tempting. What is the JO like when you really pluck hard? Is there any clipping?[/quote] IME, not that much different to a JB from the big F. Quote
andy. Posted September 2, 2009 Author Posted September 2, 2009 [quote name='fatboytoo' post='586505' date='Sep 1 2009, 01:46 PM']IME, not that much different to a JB from the big F.[/quote] What? :S Quote
fatboytoo Posted September 3, 2009 Posted September 3, 2009 [quote name='andy.' post='587934' date='Sep 2 2009, 08:40 PM']What? :S[/quote] Jazz Bass, from Fender! Quote
bassatnight Posted September 4, 2009 Posted September 4, 2009 Anyone tried the bottom of the range? the 44-01? its meant to be a good all rounder for the price? Thinking of investing and I can't stretch to a grand plus! Quote
fatboytoo Posted September 4, 2009 Posted September 4, 2009 [quote name='bassatnight' post='590005' date='Sep 4 2009, 06:38 PM']Anyone tried the bottom of the range? the 44-01? its meant to be a good all rounder for the price? Thinking of investing and I can't stretch to a grand plus![/quote] I have and it was good in a passive way, but for the same price as a newbie 44-01 you can pick up a mint 44-02 which is just that bit extra. Got mine from Josh on here and it is superb. Regards Rich Quote
bassatnight Posted September 5, 2009 Posted September 5, 2009 Whoops, too late placed the order. But managed to get it at a pretty good price at £599 which is £70 less than GAK and a massive £170 less than the Gallery (are they sure?) Passive? the active circuitry not so good then? Checked out a few via the tube and Lakland sound files and it sounded very bright with a good mix of tones. Steve. [quote name='fatboytoo' post='590070' date='Sep 4 2009, 07:41 PM']I have and it was good in a passive way, but for the same price as a newbie 44-01 you can pick up a mint 44-02 which is just that bit extra. Got mine from Josh on here and it is superb. Regards Rich[/quote] Quote
.jpg.2a95db90b70ff3f3317b0f7ee3970acb.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.