Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

No, wouldn't change a thing on either. The 51 is indeed a slab. The Squier is a slab with an arm contour only, a la Mike Dirnt, whose sig is now a Squier model also. Why change to the SD antiquity? It's no different at all to the stock pickup. We have a Sting in the shop here with that pup, and it was a swap for no reason...I love the big fat sound of the humbucker on the Squier, so why change it for a single coil? A modern amp can control the mud, so no problems with it as-is. And the other bridge cover would just not be right for this style P.
I love 'em!

Edited by Telebass
Posted

They are too different for that, really. That big 'ole mudbucker is a world away from the single coil of the 51, which is different again from the split coil humbucker in the standard Precision. This way, I have three totally different basses, all with "Precision" on the end!

Posted

The 51 can hold its own build-wise with any Fender, no matter where it was built. The Squier is remarkably well put-together for something that cost 249 or less. The neck on the Squier is really nice! It would appeal to those who fancy a slab, but prefer J necks.

Posted

haha they actually are slabs and everything! Granted they are nice looking slabs tho. Ever since i saw the la's vido "there she goes again" i've always been curious as to how one of those basses with the massive humbucker in the neck actually sounds.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...