lojo Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 (edited) If lightweight had never happened, and Markbass weighed the same as all the other classic ranges of amps and cabs we know and love (or hate), do you think they would have muscled there way into being a well known brand of bass equipment? Edited January 7, 2010 by lojo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTUK Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 no... although the amps would stand more of a chance as the LMll is good... or rather, easy to get a sound from, IME Don't rate the cabs .... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Balsamic Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 I think stuff like the LMII or F1 would still be popular. Good sounding heads IMO; people don't love them just because of the size (though that is nice). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lemmywinks Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 I think they sound great and are very loud, much louder in a gig situation than the 500w Hartke head my LMII replaced. If they were normal size they'd be on equal footing with a lot of heads but certainly better than most, probably a bit cheaper too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Musicman20 Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 I picked up a LM1 a few weeks back, (not bought it, just picked it up to see what it weighed). WOW...what a difference. The back of the amp (transformer area?) was massively heavy. Good amps all round though. Simple, nice, warm tone. The two filters are key though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigjohn Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 (edited) never played with a LM... I don't really think of an amp being heavy unless its uncomfortable to carry more than 100m... or up and down stairs... for which weight isn't the main problem really unless it's a big valve amp. Edited January 7, 2010 by bigjohn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
absentmindeduk Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Not at all. I own 2 Markbass cabs that replaced an Ampeg cab I used to own. I would have stuck with the Ampeg by choice. Only upgrade I would have considered was a Mesa powerhouse cab. However, I injured myself lifing the Ampeg bass cabs up and down the stairs to my flat. I literally checked every cab manufacturer I could find, -the Markbass traveler series were the lightest. Thus I ended up with them! My sound certainly isn't any the worse for it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigwan Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 They did heavy with the Musicman range of amps and cabs (too heavy according to some - that was the only criticism I've seen levelled at the MM cabs). They also did heavy with the first Markbass range. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jontywisp Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 when I am recently came back to bass after 20 years off I replaced my ancient valve amp (Selmer!) with a LM II plus Markbass cabs. Light, reliable, and basically the sound of your bass loud. I've now bought a secondhand EBS TD650, and the improvement in sound quality and flexibility is massive, with the same basses through the same MB cabs. While the TD 650 is best known for slapping and clarity, it really does everything superbly, including warm old school P bass much better than the LM II. while markbass does what it promises very competently, and is an innovative company, there are definitely better sounding albeit heavier heads out there but maybe an EBS microbass and/or EBS valvedrive into the LM II would bring some of the same sound improvements and flexibility, at a fraction of the weight ? for sure the many choices available now seem a lot better than most of what was available 20 years ago (incidentally, the Markbass cabs sound great with the EBS TD650, despite rarely being praised) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pantherairsoft Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 I have a MarkBass SA450, not tiny in size but yes it's light in weight. To be honest I woul pick it in sound and tone over most it's opposition putting weight aside. It sounds fantastic. Weight is a bonus, but I'd still use it. Only 'heavy' head I'd swap it for now is an EBS Fafner or TD650. Markbass cabs are fantastic as well to be honest. I was a 6x10 owner and it sounded a lot cleaner than my ampeg 8x10. I consider Markbass to be all round great. And if I end up with the move to an EBS head I'm sure I will miss part of the SA450 tone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ezbass Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 Would Mark Bass be as popular if they weren't lightweight? Probably not, I'm sure they would have made some in roads into the market, but not nearly as much as they currently enjoy. I got my LMII mainly for its size and weight (and recommendations from a couple of friends) in place of my Ashdown ABM 320 which was low on clear headroom anywhere beyond 2 o'clock on the master. The LMII is 500watts and is clear even when wide open which was a huge plus even though it doean't get used beyond 11 o'clock. I also prefer the simplified eq, which to be fair stays mainly flat. Would I have bought the LMII because of the headroom and eq if it was heavy? Probably not, I would have probably stuck with Ashdown and got a more powerful head. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanbass1 Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 (edited) Difficult question to answer really as Markbass were at the forefront of switchmode power supplies being used and their vision certainly paid off giving them a great marketing tool that made people go out and try their amps. I reckon that the majority of people with one of their amps would not have purchased Markbass if they didn't sound good, but equally people with perfectly good amps are unlikely to have bought one to replace their current equipment if they didn't the weight benefit. It is likely that Markbass caused us bass players to spend more on equipment than we would have done had there not been this revolution with true good sounding lightweight gear. It's interesting to note that they have retained their reputation and status (and probably sales) when the competition has got a lot stiffer with Eden/EA/Ashdown/Genz Benz et al got into the game. Edited January 11, 2010 by alanbass1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nottswarwick Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 My LM2 is good, but so much better with by BDDI in front of it. SO it is now lightweight and MASSIVE sounding. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drewie Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 [quote name='Uncle Balsamic' post='704687' date='Jan 7 2010, 08:02 PM']I think stuff like the LMII or F1 would still be popular. Good sounding heads IMO; people don't love them just because of the size (though that is nice).[/quote] I bought my LMII two years ago and have never looked back. I don't even think about other amps now. That's how much I like it. It ticks all my boxes (except no mute switch - I use a pedal). Easy to EQ, sounds great, is reliable, and lightweight. I pair it up with either one or two Bergantino 12's and it sounds incredible. Small rig - Big sound. I look at players schlepping around traditional big rigs to pub/clubs and wonder why... The Genz Benz Shuttles are great too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.