antti Posted January 27, 2010 Share Posted January 27, 2010 I have a very nice problem. I ordered Jaydee MKI and my very modest problem is, should I take 32" or 34" scale. Which one you prefer and why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cat Burrito Posted January 27, 2010 Share Posted January 27, 2010 I prefer 34" scale as 1) it seems to be the standard on most basses and 2) I'm tall so tend to look more comfortable with bigger basses. I've not bought nice looking basses because they have been shorter scale. The Rickenbacker is 33 1/3" but I figure what's 3/4"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marvin Posted January 27, 2010 Share Posted January 27, 2010 I'd probably have a pop at the 32'. But I'm not very big and have got crap hands Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottomEndian Posted January 27, 2010 Share Posted January 27, 2010 [quote name='Marvin' post='726124' date='Jan 27 2010, 10:35 AM']I'd probably have a pop at the 32'. But I'm not very big and have got crap hands[/quote] I suggest you don't try playing a 32-foot bass then. Stonehenge, anyone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdwardHimself Posted January 27, 2010 Share Posted January 27, 2010 (edited) I'd probably go with 34" or maybe 33" if u really can't decide between the 2? Edited January 27, 2010 by EdwardHimself Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marvin Posted January 27, 2010 Share Posted January 27, 2010 [quote name='BottomEndian' post='726129' date='Jan 27 2010, 10:38 AM']I suggest you don't try playing a 32-foot bass then. Stonehenge, anyone?[/quote] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henry norton Posted January 27, 2010 Share Posted January 27, 2010 I used to be a 34" man through and through (add your pun here please...........) but I've recently discovered shorter scales and love 'em. There won't be much of a difference sound-wise between the two although there may be slightly less choice string wise. A shorter scale makes not only the stretch a bit less but also eases the string tension if you're into bends and vibrato, as well as it just being a bit easier to play. My vote goes for 32" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lorne Posted January 27, 2010 Share Posted January 27, 2010 Depends what you want to do with it If you want to do blindingly fast runs,I find the short scale is much better,so I would vote 30.5" scale,Yeah I know you said 32" or 34", but both my Bich basses are 30.5" and amazingly fast Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antti Posted January 28, 2010 Author Share Posted January 28, 2010 Thanks guys. Keep writing. It is great to be able to read which one you prefer and why. You wont make it any easier. I am pretty much after a good slap bass at the moment. I already have that Jazz bass and CB but one good slap bass is what I am after. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdwardHimself Posted January 28, 2010 Share Posted January 28, 2010 [quote name='antti' post='727422' date='Jan 28 2010, 11:33 AM']Thanks guys. Keep writing. It is great to be able to read which one you prefer and why. You wont make it any easier. I am pretty much after a good slap bass at the moment. I already have that Jazz bass and CB but one good slap bass is what I am after. [/quote] In that case, definetly get the 34". The extra tension really improves the slap tone of a bass no end imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4000 Posted January 28, 2010 Share Posted January 28, 2010 My Alembic Stanley Clarke was 30" scale and probably had my favourite slap tone of all the basses I've owned. It was a total flyer too. It all depends on what type of slap tone you like really. Marcus, Les, Larry, Mark King etc etc? All very different. In fact MK has different slap tones depending on what bass he's using. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Count Bassy Posted January 28, 2010 Share Posted January 28, 2010 4 out my 5 basses are 32" and I love them, although 2" might not seem much I certainly find the stretches easier, especially when playing/fretting two notes at once. There are some things I can play on a 32" which I physically can't do on the 34". The 34" is a fretless fiver, but the only reason I went for the 34" was that there are so few 32" fivers around, and none that I could afford. However one advantage of the 5 string is that you can play a lot of things 5 frets up, so you're effectivley playing about a 27" scale. Obviously some tonal differences in playing 5 frets up however. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lorne Posted January 28, 2010 Share Posted January 28, 2010 [quote name='4000' post='727522' date='Jan 28 2010, 01:12 PM']My Alembic Stanley Clarke was 30" scale and probably had my favourite slap tone of all the basses I've owned. It was a total flyer too. It all depends on what type of slap tone you like really. Marcus, Les, Larry, Mark King etc etc? All very different. In fact MK has different slap tones depending on what bass he's using.[/quote] Agreed 100% My Rosewood fretboarded Bich bass is a Slap monster,the Ebony boarded one is quite good,but I think the Ebony strangles the tone a bit? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickH Posted January 28, 2010 Share Posted January 28, 2010 [quote name='EdwardHimself' post='727449' date='Jan 28 2010, 11:59 AM']In that case, definetly get the 34". The extra tension really improves the slap tone of a bass no end imo.[/quote] QFT I got an entirely custom 5 made at one point and it was 35.5". Was doing lots of low-B metal riffage and the extra length made everything really clear. Was a bit of a bugger to play mind, but that's what practice time is for. Pity the poor DB guys! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdwardHimself Posted January 28, 2010 Share Posted January 28, 2010 [quote name='4000' post='727522' date='Jan 28 2010, 01:12 PM']My Alembic Stanley Clarke was 30" scale and probably had my favourite slap tone of all the basses I've owned. It was a total flyer too. It all depends on what type of slap tone you like really. Marcus, Les, Larry, Mark King etc etc? All very different. In fact MK has different slap tones depending on what bass he's using.[/quote] I suppose you're right but when i stuck heavy strings on my bass i really thought it sounded great for slap. As i say, imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris2112 Posted January 28, 2010 Share Posted January 28, 2010 I'd usually go for a 34" scale bass for slapping because of the nice tension they have. But my Kubicki Ex-Factor was 32" and sounded incredible slapped. Stuart Hamm has had similarly good results - and the Status Kingbass is 32" scale and has one of the best tones on the planet! Furthermore, listen to Rose Colored Glasses by Animal Logic and tell me Stanley isn't getting a good slap tone there on his 30" scale Alembic! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antti Posted January 28, 2010 Author Share Posted January 28, 2010 Yes, it seems it is also pretty much up to what bass you are playing. I know Jaydee has some ebony fingerboard and that makes the sound little brighter? What kind of strings you prefer when you play 34" or 32"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lorne Posted January 28, 2010 Share Posted January 28, 2010 I use D'addario EXL 170's on all of my basses,regardless of scale length,even had them on a Yamaha RBX 6JM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.