Old Horse Murphy Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 Well, after a bit of a clean up, the bass is as good as new. It was built in 1999 (although I'm still waiting to confirm what number it is out of the 1000 made). It sounds classic Rickenbacker and plays reall quickly due to the thin neck. The fretboard has really unusual white flecks running through it (I'm not sure if its the same wood as the wings on the headstock; if it is, then its Vermilion.) The horseshoe pickup looks amazing and the condition is excellent (a few tiny dings on the back and a mark on the upper and lower edge but I think you only notice them because the body is light coloured). The official colour is Cream Colorglo and the pickguard is clear plastic which has been painted on the back and had Chris Squire's signature too. Unlike most modern Rickenbackers, there's only one input jack (a mono one) and there's no binding on either the body or neck. It body size is a fair bit smaller than a normal 4001/4003. Whenever I used to see Chris Squire playing this bass in photos I used to think he was a giant with hands the size of plates! It's actually quite a small bass that tucks neatly under the arm (very comfortable). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Nimrod Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 What a fantastic find - you did well! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stingrayfan Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 Not my thing but amazing looking instrument. It looks like a museum piece. More importantly what did the wife say when you got it home? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreeneKing Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 (edited) Wow Nick that's absolutely stunning. Congratulations. I love the cream finish. I suspect it sounds a bit better than a standard 4003 with that Horseshoe and toaster Peter Edited November 21, 2007 by GreeneKing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Horse Murphy Posted November 21, 2007 Author Share Posted November 21, 2007 Thanks for the kind words guys. It really is in very good nick and I still can't believe I found it where I did. When I showed Alice last night, she actually said she liked it!! I don't think that gives me permission to keep it though. I'd be very reluctant to use it in anger and gig it. I'm in 2 minds though. It's a beautiful instrument and has obviously been well looked after. BUT.......it is an instrument after all and I feel it should be treated as such. A bit of a dilemma (a nice one to have though). At some stage I will probably move it on and let someone else decide what they want it for (I can't afford an expensive ornament like this). At the moment though it's sitting nicely snuggled between my other basses, winking at me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geddys nose Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 I would think thats my dream bass I love how it looks like its wrapped in that cream finish almost like a chocolate bar! Great Score and a great looking bass.S Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Horse Murphy Posted November 21, 2007 Author Share Posted November 21, 2007 [quote name='Geddys nose' post='92017' date='Nov 21 2007, 10:06 AM']I would think thats my dream bass I love how it looks like its wrapped in that cream finish almost like a chocolate bar! Great Score and a great looking bass.S[/quote] You've made me feel hungry now.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul, the Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 That's a lovely looker. I just hope the other bidder wasn't too attached to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussiephoenix Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 arent the dot markers supposed to be sharkfin inlays? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Horse Murphy Posted November 21, 2007 Author Share Posted November 21, 2007 [quote name='Aussiephoenix' post='92129' date='Nov 21 2007, 01:21 PM']arent the dot markers supposed to be sharkfin inlays?[/quote] Not on this model. It's based on Chris Squire's original Rickenbacker RM1999 bass, which was a variation on the 4001 which has the fins Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timface Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 IM IN LOVE I WANT IT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silverfoxnik Posted November 22, 2007 Share Posted November 22, 2007 Very cool! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
synaesthesia Posted November 22, 2007 Share Posted November 22, 2007 [quote name='Old Horse Murphy' post='91967' date='Nov 21 2007, 07:42 AM']Well, after a bit of a clean up, the bass is as good as new. It was built in 1999 (although I'm still waiting to confirm what number it is out of the 1000 made). It sounds classic Rickenbacker and plays reall quickly due to the thin neck. The fretboard has really unusual white flecks running through it (I'm not sure if its the same wood as the wings on the headstock; if it is, then its Vermilion.) The horseshoe pickup looks amazing and the condition is excellent (a few tiny dings on the back and a mark on the upper and lower edge but I think you only notice them because the body is light coloured). The official colour is Cream Colorglo and the pickguard is clear plastic which has been painted on the back and had Chris Squire's signature too. Unlike most modern Rickenbackers, there's only one input jack (a mono one) and there's no binding on either the body or neck. It body size is a fair bit smaller than a normal 4001/4003. Whenever I used to see Chris Squire playing this bass in photos I used to think he was a giant with hands the size of plates! It's actually quite a small bass that tucks neatly under the arm (very comfortable).[/quote] EMAIL RIC with the serial number, they should have the records. They are very standoffish people though, you have been warned. The serial number is on the jackplate (of all places). John Hall has gone on record to say they have never used Vermillion on a fingerboard. The body size should be the same. The model with the dots and no binding was a Rose Morris import request in the 60s to be competitive in pricing in the UK market then. So it originated in the UK, though the model 4000 with a single pickup was similar. The standard 4001 then being bound and blocked (sharktooth) necked. The model in the UK was known as "1999" and 4001S in the US. I can tell you that for the colour, and the signature pickguard, there is no difference between my dot necked , no binding, jetglo 4001sV63 and the CS, though the headstock wood for the black instrument may be different (I can't tell). The fingerboard is similar though and is a rosewood variant. Mister Squire's bass was refinished in Soho by a Chinese repairman. Mr Macartney's bass was painted in the Sgt Pepper era, and cleaned up later, with some vicious sanding which actually changed the shape of the horns. I don't know that the Squire bass was sanded viciously or not when it was refinished, probably... BTW, Chris Squire is on the RIC forum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Horse Murphy Posted November 26, 2007 Author Share Posted November 26, 2007 [quote name='synaesthesia' post='92701' date='Nov 22 2007, 12:59 PM']EMAIL RIC with the serial number, they should have the records. They are very standoffish people though, you have been warned. The serial number is on the jackplate (of all places). John Hall has gone on record to say they have never used Vermillion on a fingerboard. The body size should be the same. The model with the dots and no binding was a Rose Morris import request in the 60s to be competitive in pricing in the UK market then. So it originated in the UK, though the model 4000 with a single pickup was similar. The standard 4001 then being bound and blocked (sharktooth) necked. The model in the UK was known as "1999" and 4001S in the US. I can tell you that for the colour, and the signature pickguard, there is no difference between my dot necked , no binding, jetglo 4001sV63 and the CS, though the headstock wood for the black instrument may be different (I can't tell). The fingerboard is similar though and is a rosewood variant. Mister Squire's bass was refinished in Soho by a Chinese repairman. Mr Macartney's bass was painted in the Sgt Pepper era, and cleaned up later, with some vicious sanding which actually changed the shape of the horns. I don't know that the Squire bass was sanded viciously or not when it was refinished, probably... BTW, Chris Squire is on the RIC forum.[/quote] Thanks very much for the info- much appreciated. RIC has confirmed that the Serial number tallies with their records (dates from 1999) but they didn't tell me which number in the series it is!! I'll try them again (they seem a bit precious). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stag Posted November 26, 2007 Share Posted November 26, 2007 MMM, thats a beaut. Its in incredibly good nick as well innit? Would love to have a plunk on one of them someday... like the idea of a thinner neck as my 4001 is a bit "phat". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.