warwickhunt Posted November 23, 2007 Share Posted November 23, 2007 [url="http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/VINTAGE-Fender-Jazz-Bass-Precision-crafted-bass_W0QQitemZ190176668263QQihZ009QQcategoryZ4713QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem"]http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/VINTAGE-Fender-Jazz-...1QQcmdZViewItem[/url] Well he's having one last attempt at getting a response I expect! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ped Posted November 23, 2007 Share Posted November 23, 2007 I don't fully understand what is going on here but this strikes me as a funny way of getting attention. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamster Posted November 23, 2007 Share Posted November 23, 2007 [quote name='ped' post='93426' date='Nov 23 2007, 05:23 PM']I don't fully understand what is going on here but this strikes me as a funny way of getting attention.[/quote] He's trying to 'name & shame' tune-o-matic without naming to avoid possible legal action. Basically he says he was sold a poor refinish for the price of a 100% original. Hamster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bassaussie Posted November 24, 2007 Share Posted November 24, 2007 I've seen these auctions for months now, and I've always wondered what the truth was. Do any of the Fender experts have an opinion? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warwickhunt Posted November 24, 2007 Author Share Posted November 24, 2007 [quote name='bassaussie' post='93647' date='Nov 24 2007, 09:07 AM']I've seen these auctions for months now, and I've always wondered what the truth was. Do any of the Fender experts have an opinion?[/quote] Many of us have seen images of the offending areas and it clearly isn't original... as to who is to blame! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bassaussie Posted November 24, 2007 Share Posted November 24, 2007 [quote name='warwickhunt' post='93661' date='Nov 24 2007, 09:39 AM']Many of us have seen images of the offending areas and it clearly isn't original... as to who is to blame![/quote] What ..... is there a suggestion that the guy who's running these auctions may've doctored the bass? And what about the finish? Is there a chance that he's correct? I do find the part about Tune-O-Matic not having the details of who he bought it from to be a bit suspect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warwickhunt Posted November 24, 2007 Author Share Posted November 24, 2007 [quote name='bassaussie' post='93675' date='Nov 24 2007, 10:34 AM']What ..... is there a suggestion that the guy who's running these auctions may've doctored the bass? And what about the finish? Is there a chance that he's correct? I do find the part about Tune-O-Matic not having the details of who he bought it from to be a bit suspect.[/quote] No I'm not suggesting that the buyer doctored the bass. In previous discussions about this particular instrument it's been pointed out that there is paint over-spray that clearly couldn't have originated at the factory (over some masking tape or some such like). All I was pointing out is that I am well aware that there are 2 sides to every story and whilst evidence produced appears to place all blame on the US seller, at no point has that person responded. I concede that could be an acceptance of guilt but I don't know whether the buyer and seller have had other communication that we aren't privvy to... just playing devils advocate! If the US seller really has no details of whom he bought it from that really is unacceptable for a registered trader. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bassaussie Posted November 24, 2007 Share Posted November 24, 2007 [quote name='warwickhunt' post='93796' date='Nov 24 2007, 03:44 PM']No I'm not suggesting that the buyer doctored the bass. In previous discussions about this particular instrument it's been pointed out that there is paint over-spray that clearly couldn't have originated at the factory (over some masking tape or some such like). All I was pointing out is that I am well aware that there are 2 sides to every story and whilst evidence produced appears to place all blame on the US seller, at no point has that person responded. I concede that could be an acceptance of guilt but I don't know whether the buyer and seller have had other communication that we aren't privvy to... just playing devils advocate! If the US seller really has no details of whom he bought it from that really is unacceptable for a registered trader.[/quote] Cool. Hey, don't take my questions wrong - I honestly don't know anything about these auctions other than that I keep seeing them on Ebay. Just trying to catch up on what info's available, so thanks for doing that!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.