Tee Posted December 8, 2007 Share Posted December 8, 2007 (edited) I've been reading up on this head (the cased one, not the RC version), with regards to what cabs compliment it. It comes as no surprise that ABM cabs are most likely to get the nod. I have a question though. The head is 575W @ 4 ohms, yet the ABM 410 cab, for example is 600W @ 8 ohms, according to the Ash site. Am i right in thinking you won't therefore be getting the most out of the head? (with regards to power). And shouldn't the ohm rating match, seeing as they're from the same series? Edit: i guess you can have to 8 ohm cabs running. Edited December 20, 2007 by Tee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveDDF Posted December 9, 2007 Share Posted December 9, 2007 I use an ABM 8x10. Used to have an ABM 4x10 & a ABM 1x15, but I generally prefer 10's so I switched over. I think my 8x10 is a 4 ohm cab (it's not at home to check!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tee Posted December 20, 2007 Author Share Posted December 20, 2007 I like 410s but would the 115 compact and 210 compact be a good alternative, particularly if i want to get the most out of the amp? Does anyone have this set up? I'd love to hear your thoughts on its sound. I wish i could A/B the two set ups but sadly shops are pretty crap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machines Posted December 20, 2007 Share Posted December 20, 2007 Correct - an 8ohm cab will not get the most from the head. 2 x 8ohm cabs would, or 1 x 4ohm cab would. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tee Posted December 20, 2007 Author Share Posted December 20, 2007 Looks like the two (210+115) together might be the better option then. Has anyone played through Ashdown's ABM 4x8s? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machines Posted December 20, 2007 Share Posted December 20, 2007 If you can get a 410 i'd go for that, the 48 is more for portability and space requirements than anything else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tee Posted December 20, 2007 Author Share Posted December 20, 2007 (edited) That is certainly an influential factor - portability, space etc. One 410 wouldn't be as good as the 210+115, powerwise though. Plus, i guess for smaller gigs, one could just take one of these cabs (less hassle). At the moment, my amp is only a (heavy) 350W 210 combo (Ampeg BA500). Hmm, what about 2x 210s? Edited December 20, 2007 by Tee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machines Posted December 20, 2007 Share Posted December 20, 2007 2 x 210 is better than 1 x 410 (unless the 410 is 4ohm). A lot of people on here have said 2 x 210 is better than 1 x 210 + 1 x 115. My 210 is enough at the moment, but if I do upgrade it'll probably be another MAG210. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tee Posted December 20, 2007 Author Share Posted December 20, 2007 (edited) Yeah, i've also heard about the supposed merits of 2x 210s. As i said, i'm a fan of four 10 inch speakers. 2x 210s ought to give a punchy sound, plus use the amp's full power. Ta Edited December 20, 2007 by Tee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tee Posted December 20, 2007 Author Share Posted December 20, 2007 A Columbo-like,[i] "one more thing."[/i] I know the ABM 500 head has one speakon and one 1/4" output. What do the ABM cabs have? Does it mirror the head config? If they're only 1/4", i guess i'll need one speakon to 1/4" cable then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamster Posted December 20, 2007 Share Posted December 20, 2007 Running two 2x10 8ohm cabs and stacking them vertically might be worth considering. Hamster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machines Posted December 20, 2007 Share Posted December 20, 2007 Yeah the cabs have a normal 1/4 and speakon connector (like the head). So for 2 cabs you'd need one normal speaker cable and one speakon cable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ou7shined Posted December 22, 2007 Share Posted December 22, 2007 My 2002 ABM 410 just has twin 1/4" connectors. I use a 6m speakon > 1/4" high def stage cable to hook it up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tee Posted December 23, 2007 Author Share Posted December 23, 2007 Meh, which one is it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
umcoo Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 Not sure if you knew, but ashdown did the ABM 414, which was a 4 ohm version of the 410. Same dimensions as the 410, but gets all the juice form the amp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ou7shined Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 [quote name='Tee' post='108475' date='Dec 23 2007, 11:07 AM']Meh, which one is it? [/quote] Mine? It's a full sized 410T like [url="http://www.ashdownmusic.com/bass/detail.asp?ID=14"]this[/url] one only with the old square style handles. I'm fairly sure that the newer ones have speakons too but you should probably email the dudes at Ashdown to confirm this - not that it's a problem either way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warwickhunt Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 [quote name='Tee' post='106949' date='Dec 20 2007, 10:40 AM']Looks like the two (210+115) together might be the better option then. [b]Has anyone played through Ashdown's ABM 4x8s[/b]?[/quote] I think that both 'Water of Tyne' and 'Marcus' have had the 4x8 might be worth a quick PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marky L Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 Just to jump in and add my bit. I recently got an Ashdown Classic 500 and have picked up a used mini 1x15 and 4x8 to go with it. I needed something light and easy to shift but could deal with a bit of power, so I went for these, otherwise a 4x10 would have been in my scope, ideally a neo one. I'm of an old mind set where I feel I need a 15 in the mix to give that thickness at the bottom as I do use a lot of top (damn you JJ Burnel, 's all your fault!) Anyway, I know diddly sh*t about technicalities and stuff, but I have have gigged this set up twice now with a Thunderbird and it gives me a nice big sound, a bit of dirt thrown in too and loads of head room. Whether a set up with 10s would be significantly different, I can't say, but currently I am very happy with what I've got. Cheers y'all Mark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.