morsefull Posted August 7, 2010 Share Posted August 7, 2010 (edited) Is it me, or are things starting to get really tight [url="http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=150474425897&ssPageName=ADME:B:WNA:GB:1123"]http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vie...E:B:WNA:GB:1123[/url] I thought this would sell for at least £200 more. Edited August 8, 2010 by morsefull Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Foxen Posted August 7, 2010 Share Posted August 7, 2010 Warwick's might just be unfashionable. I think Rick's are in. But I really don't keep up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Annoying Twit Posted August 7, 2010 Share Posted August 7, 2010 Ever since I arrived in this forum, people have been commenting on Warwicks not selling for all that much, compared to new prices. I get the impression that there are an awful lot of them, which tips the supply/demand ratio in favour of supply. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morsefull Posted August 8, 2010 Author Share Posted August 8, 2010 The reason I was so amazed is that having owned a SS1, I know what awesome basses they are. It's a good job I'm GAS free or I'd have been bidding the price up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.7e18f76540598a8efc0e6ca9be453059.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.