lonestar Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 (edited) +3 +675 Edited December 17, 2007 by lonestar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr pablo Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 (edited) +1 =676 Edited December 17, 2007 by mr pablo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
16Again Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 + 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
queenofthedepths Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 [quote name='GreeneKing' post='105488' date='Dec 17 2007, 06:55 PM']I see that the total is actually higher as some people have done their sums and then posted but more have been added meanwhile. Someone needs to go through and check the whole thread when it's died down. Any volunteers? Peter[/quote] I've taken it upon myself to do this as we go along, in fact [quote name='Platypus' post='105494' date='Dec 17 2007, 07:01 PM']+ 4 makes it 644[/quote] [quote name='MB1' post='105497' date='Dec 17 2007, 07:03 PM']MB1. Down to TWO! ......648.....THEN [/quote] Um..? I believe we should be on 680 at the moment! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sibob Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 (edited) +6 =686 Si Edited December 17, 2007 by Sibob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clydefrog Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 +5 =691 Si Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldGit Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 [quote name='queenofthedepths' post='105553' date='Dec 17 2007, 08:08 PM']I've taken it upon myself to do this as we go along, in fact Um..? I believe we should be on 680 at the moment![/quote] You've not counted the people have you? Be interesting to average the number etc Si Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richy316 Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 +1 for me = 692? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
et1058 Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 +5 = 697 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeh Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 +3 700 I wont mention all the others I've had Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onehappybunny Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 +2 = 702 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugz Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 +4 706 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nedsbeds Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 +4 710 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaBassMonsta Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 +2 [b]708[/b] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breakfast Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 +3 711 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazm Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 +10 721 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
queenofthedepths Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 [quote name='OldGit' post='105559' date='Dec 17 2007, 08:28 PM']You've not counted the people have you? Be interesting to average the number etc Si[/quote] I hadn't, but now I have... 129 so far! Perhaps people could state which number person they are as well as their bass count and the cumulative total? So the next person shall be #130 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
queenofthedepths Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 [quote name='OldGit' post='105318' date='Dec 17 2007, 01:29 PM']Rats! We should have had a person count and a matrix to tick for number of basses so we could do real stats like how many replied, how many have 1,2,3,4 ... 33, etc ...[/quote] That's an interesting idea too - any of the mods got any idea how we could do this..? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fleamail Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 (edited) #130 +4 725 Edited December 17, 2007 by fleamail Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARGH Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 [quote name='queenofthedepths' post='105618' date='Dec 17 2007, 10:41 PM']That's an interesting idea too - any of the mods got any idea how we could do this..?[/quote] Is it possible to sub divide into what we use..fretless,six string etc etc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
queenofthedepths Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 [quote name='ARGH' post='105639' date='Dec 17 2007, 11:14 PM']Is it possible to sub divide into what we use..fretless,six string etc etc[/quote] I saw your username and the first thing I thought was "How about a thread to count how many strings we have?" Just on basses, my count is 50! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARGH Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 (edited) [quote name='queenofthedepths' post='105643' date='Dec 17 2007, 11:19 PM']I saw your username and the first thing I thought was "How about a thread to count how many strings we have?" Just on basses, my count is 50![/quote] Im on 40 4 4 4f 4u 5 5f 5f 9 Edited December 18, 2007 by ARGH Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
queenofthedepths Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 (edited) [quote name='ARGH' post='105647' date='Dec 17 2007, 11:22 PM']Im on 40 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 9[/quote] Wow, I always assumed you had more than one ERB! Straight from 5 to 9 must have been a bit of a leap! I have 4 5 5 5 5 5 6 7 8 And because of that, your 9 makes me feel inadequate! Edited December 17, 2007 by queenofthedepths Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OutToPlayJazz Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 #131 +9 =734 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARGH Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 (edited) [quote name='queenofthedepths' post='105649' date='Dec 17 2007, 11:23 PM']Wow, I always assumed you had more than one ERB! Straight from 5 to 9 must have been a bit of a leap! I have 4 5 5 5 5 5 6 7 8 And because of that, your 9 makes me feel inadequate! [/quote] Dude I went from 4 to 5, 6 weeks ago,and then went 9, 2 weeks later after that. I had a 6, years and years back,but couldnt know how to play it,or get on with it,shame,because It would have been good to keep,but I guess thats given me the knowledge on what NOT to do,when it comes to learning. String number has nothing to do with adequacy,its just experience,and what you feel the need to express that experience with. going to sell a few soon anyway.....a fretless clearout,and a few fretted as well. Edited December 17, 2007 by ARGH Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.7e18f76540598a8efc0e6ca9be453059.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.